--
Sorry, Ed. No cigar.
Djou you think so Mr. Rendell? Djou you think so?
It does help when the takers outnumber the givers by a 2 to 1 margin in the district. Sorry Eddie, you’re full of it. That district is not the norm in America.
So what are they really saying, that they didn’t actually expect to win any races? They won one in a solidly Dem district and they’re acting like they won it from a district that’s gone Republican for decades.
The truth is Fast Eddy, you might win one here and there. If Murtha’s seat indicates anything it’s that the Dems are going to have to have 2:1 majorities and run as conservatives to even win the occasional seat.
Although Murtha’s old seat is disheartening. The dem primary that ousted specter brought out more dems than GOPers.
Fast Eddie is just blowing smoke.
Rendell is living a fantasy.
Hey, Fast Eddie, PA got a budget yet...?
Good God, I’ll be glad when that slob Fast Eddie is gone...
Just keep telling yourselves that Eddie! Sounds more like a wish than a fact!
Eddie its comments like this which is going to make beating you and your whole decadent cabal even the more sweet.
Good one Fast Eddie! So is PA in the running for the ‘what state will go bankrupt first race’? Although there’s stiff competition with CA & NY I’ll bet yer a contender.
“Tea Party candidates will be easier to beat in November elections “
Isn’t that what they said about Reagan? Sleeps through cabinet meetings, is stupid, nothing more than a “B” movie actor?
They keep moving the goalposts. Remember the Tea Party was nothing but a just few angry racists? Remember then they were illigitimate Teabaggers? Now were going to lose in November, huh?
Pffft... which is it Democrats??
Every philly cop I have met has insisted that it was a know fact that Rendell was a homosexual.
Just sayin’.
Wishful thinking Rendell, wishful thinking.
IMHO that means as clear as can be, exactly the opposite is the case.
180 degree opposite. Dems are getting spooked by the possibility the GOP may move right. Because then, they would have actual opponents.
And people would even consider voting for Republicans, who aren’t fraidy cats, of their own shadows.
My question: why is it, the article identified everyone’s party affiliation.
Except Rendell’s.
Just saying.