Posted on 05/23/2010 11:23:51 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said Sunday that the results of his home state's special election show that the Tea Party's electoral influence is limited.
Mark Critz, a Democrat, won the election Tuesday to fill the seat of the late Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.). Rendell also said on CNN's "State of the Union" that the post-election controversy with Rand Paul and his comments about the Civil Rights Act shows that the Tea Party will flail come November elections.
"The Tea Party candidates are going to be more easy to beat in the general election" than Republicans such as Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and Utah Sen. Bob Bennett, Rendell said.
He pointed out that Murtha's district had gone to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in the general election but, while acknowledging that the conservative Tea Party movement had influence in GOP primaries, said "the Tea Party was not a factor at all" in Pennsylvania.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty said that while Paul's comments were "unfortunate," the Tea Party still represented new ideas and a fresh passion in the political arena.
"We'll take that energy," Pawlenty said. "It's still a little chaotic in some ways, but it's a good thing."
But Pawlenty noted that the shift away from a Democratic president and his policies didn't necessarily drive voters to the GOP.
"We have to address the bread-and-butter issues that people are most concerned about," he said, including jobs.
"The best advice for anyone running is to be for change," Pawlenty said, adding that incumbents suffered at the polls because of a "sense of a commitment to flawed strategies."
Rendell said that voters weren't against government spending, but just wanted "effective government" that invested in the wisest way possible.
“Tea Party candidates will be easier to beat in November elections “
Isn’t that what they said about Reagan? Sleeps through cabinet meetings, is stupid, nothing more than a “B” movie actor?
They keep moving the goalposts. Remember the Tea Party was nothing but a just few angry racists? Remember then they were illigitimate Teabaggers? Now were going to lose in November, huh?
Pffft... which is it Democrats??
Every philly cop I have met has insisted that it was a know fact that Rendell was a homosexual.
Just sayin’.
I’m struck by the complete arrogance of the Democrat’s responses.
Between the marginalization of the Tea Party movement to the “economy is better” mantra, it’s almost as if the Democrats are trying to antagonize voters.
Wishful thinking Rendell, wishful thinking.
IMHO that means as clear as can be, exactly the opposite is the case.
180 degree opposite. Dems are getting spooked by the possibility the GOP may move right. Because then, they would have actual opponents.
And people would even consider voting for Republicans, who aren’t fraidy cats, of their own shadows.
My question: why is it, the article identified everyone’s party affiliation.
Except Rendell’s.
Just saying.
if anything it says that the dems are toast, because the Rat that won in PA 12 ran as a conservative to win in a 2:1 dem district, sounding off to the right of the Republican...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.