Skip to comments.
BP admits higher leak rate: 2010 Gulf oil spill now 20 times worse than Exxon Valdez
www.examiner.com ^
 | May 21, 11:01 AM
 | Maryann Tobin
Posted on 05/22/2010 6:51:24 AM PDT by valkyry1
BP admits higher leak rate: 2010 Gulf oil spill now 20 times worse then Exxon Valdez 
British Petroleum has now admitted that the amount of oil being spilled has actually been much higher than previously reported. 
According to an MSBNC report today, estimates of the total amount of oil spilled so far is 20 times more than the 10.8 million gallons spilled in the Exxon Valdez disaster in March 1989. 
Right now, the spill is roughly the size of Pennsylvania. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of water within US borders. 
snip 
This is - without question - the worst unnatural disaster in the history of our planet. The results can be nothing short of annihilation of every living thing in the path of this nightmarish cataclysm. There is simply too much oil out there already for the outcome to be anything less.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catastrophe; deepwater; horizon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next  last
    
1
posted on 
05/22/2010 6:51:24 AM PDT
by 
valkyry1
 
To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
2
posted on 
05/22/2010 6:51:59 AM PDT
by 
valkyry1
 
To: valkyry1
    In this story has the difference between refined oil and this type been factored into the equation?
This doom scenario seems extreme?
 
3
posted on 
05/22/2010 6:53:51 AM PDT
by 
3D-JOY
 
To: valkyry1
    There is a trillion million billion times more hyperbole in this “news” article than has ever been seen in the history of the universe.
 
4
posted on 
05/22/2010 6:58:37 AM PDT
by 
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
 
To: valkyry1
    Speculation of hurricanes spreading the misery is overwrought, IMHO.
 Hurricanes are circular in motion, which would turn the Gulf into a thick mess of froth; however, that froth may be the necessary "aeration" with ocean water (and air) to eventually dissipate the oil.
 
5
posted on 
05/22/2010 6:59:02 AM PDT
by 
Does so
(ObamaCare...I pay for medical-marijuana claims by millions of Americans? 'Guess I do now.)
 
To: valkyry1
    I am sure Obama will get right on this ... after his state dinner... and after he appoints a commission to study the issue and release a report in a few months.
Obama = Epic Fail
 
To: avg_freeper
    I give the “spill” story four months (at most) “to dissipate”. ;-)
 
7
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:02:02 AM PDT
by 
Does so
(ObamaCare...I pay for medical-marijuana claims by millions of Americans? 'Guess I do now.)
 
To: valkyry1
    So oil is man made if its an unnatural disaster.
 
8
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:05:18 AM PDT
by 
omega4179
(www.jdforsenate.com)
 
To: valkyry1
    If this is true, there must by an ungodly amount of oil left on this earth and nobody wants us to know! I already know there is enough for 100’s of years if not more but the gov doesn’t want to let us know as to keep a boot on our throats!
 
To: valkyry1
    “This is - without question - the worst unnatural disaster in the history of our planet. The results can be nothing short of annihilation of every living thing in the path of this nightmarish cataclysm. There is simply too much oil out there already for the outcome to be anything less.”
Hyperbole squared.
 
To: valkyry1
    No numbers at the article. Hmmm. Sure, it can easily be worse as 'spills' go than the Exxon Valdez. The Valdez was a boat wreck, the cargo was oil, and the quantity limited. 
This isn't a 'spill' so much as an uncontrolled well, a blowout.
They're working on getting the well under control.
 
11
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:12:08 AM PDT
by 
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
 
To: valkyry1
    remember what palin said about the bp head. She know him personally and that she had to verify everything that the oil company said. It doesn’t match reality
 
12
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:14:59 AM PDT
by 
4rcane
 
To: avg_freeper
    “That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of water within US borders.”
This one is my favorite.
 
13
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:15:27 AM PDT
by 
bolobaby
 
To: Smokin' Joe
    The Valdez ran ashore 3 miles from the coastline. Funny how they neglected to mention that.
 
To: valkyry1
    
 "Obama was top recipient of BP-related dollars in 2008
 Washington (CNN) -- As petroleum giant BP comes under congressional scrutiny 
as its ruptured oil rig pumps thousands of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, 
its political contributions are being scrutinized, too.
 The top recipient of BP-related donations during the 2008 presidential election was Barack Obama,
 who collected $71,000, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics." 
 
  
  "Obama biggest recipient of BP cash
 BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million
 to federal candidates over the past 20 years,
with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama 
" 
 
  
  "U.S. exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study
 The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico 
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year.." 
 
  
  "Obama admin exempted BPs Gulf drilling from environmental impact study
 Obama was the top recipient of donations from BP in 2008, 
... He let BPs gulf drilling be exempt from an environmental study last year.
 The decision by the departments Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BPs lease at Deepwater Horizon a categorical exclusion 
from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009  
and BPs lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion" 
 
  
  "The Cover-up: BP's Crude Politics and the Looming Environmental Mega-Disaster
 WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection 
that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign
more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton, 
are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico 
and working together to limit BP's liability for damage caused by what can be called a "mega-disaster." 
 
  
  "Obama sheltered BP's Deepwater Horizon rig from regulatory requirement
 Last year the Obama administration granted oil giant BP a special exemption 
from a legal requirement that it produce a detailed environmental impact study 
on the possible effects of its Deepwater Horizon drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico,
 Federal documents show that the Department of the Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS) gave BP a "categorical exclusion" on April 6, 2009 " 
 
  
  "Red Flags Were Ignored Aboard Doomed Rig 
 Managers at oil giant BP PLC decided to forge ahead in finishing work 
on the doomed Deepwater Horizon rig 
despite some tests suggesting that highly combustible gas had seeped into the well" 
 
  
  "US allowed drilling 'without required permits'
 Oil spill scandal: an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, 
with a complaint claims the Department of Interior has approved 
over 300 drilling operations, 
three large lease sales and over 100 seismic surveys 
without the required permits
The approvals by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) included greenlighting
 the well drilled by the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig that exploded on April 20" 
 
  
  "U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits
 The federal Minerals Management Service gave permission to BP and dozens of other oil companies
 to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first getting required permits " 
 
15
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:21:05 AM PDT
by 
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
 
To: valkyry1
    Rush said the CEO of BP is a certified geologist. Most of the oil is being emulsified in the waters.
 
To: valkyry1
    According to an MSBNC report todayNuff said
 
17
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:24:10 AM PDT
by 
kanawa
 
To: Diogenesis
18
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:26:58 AM PDT
by 
valkyry1
 
To: valkyry1
    This well should have been demolished with explosives weeks ago. Instead of rescuing the well it should have been permanently sealed with explosives. Drilled down three hundred feet and detonated. Even a few shaped charges collapsing the well from 2,3,4 directions
 
19
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:27:57 AM PDT
by 
dennisw
(The falser the prophet the more mentally deranged the adherents)
 
To: dennisw
    Its pressure might be so great that would not have worked unless they went a lot deeper, what do you think?
 
20
posted on 
05/22/2010 7:30:37 AM PDT
by 
valkyry1
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson