Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blumenthal Walks On Backs of Those Who Served In Vietnam (Oliver North)
Fox News ^ | May 19, 2010 | Oliver North

Posted on 05/19/2010 12:01:05 PM PDT by jazusamo

What Richard Blumenthal has been doing through much of his public career is to walk on the backs of those who really did serve in Vietnam – and falsely build affinity with those who serve today.

A hero is a person who puts him or herself at risk for the benefit of others. That certainly characterizes anyone who donned a uniform and went to war, voluntarily put themselves in harm’s way in our armed forces and those who serve or served far from home in difficult or dangerous circumstances. That’s an apt description of those with whom I served in Vietnam. That’s not Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General of Connecticut, who wants to be his state’s next United States Senator. He’s a phony.

According to The New York Times, the Associated Press and just about every other news outlet on the planet, Mr. Blumenthal has made a habit of portraying himself as a veteran of the Vietnam War. He is quoted as having told a Connecticut veteran’s group in March of 2008, “We have learned something important since the days I served in Vietnam…” He has also emotionally recalled being “spat on” and “we couldn’t wear our uniforms” when “we returned from Vietnam.” On other occasions he has reflected on “…the taunts, the insults, sometimes physical abuse” he suffered after coming back from Vietnam. At a 2003 rally in Bridgeport, Conn. to support U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan he said, “When we returned, we saw nothing like this…” Unfortunately for Mr. Blumenthal, we now know he never served in Vietnam. He has known it all along.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: backs; blumenthal; connecticut; ct; north; olivernorth; richardblumenthal; served; stolenvalor; vietnam; walks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Thank you, Lt. Col. Oliver North!
1 posted on 05/19/2010 12:01:06 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2rightsleftcoast; abner; ACAC; advertising guy; Arkinsaw; athelass; aumrl; basil; bboop; BAW; ...
OLIVER NORTH PING!

Photobucket

Please Freepmail me to be added to the Ollie North ping list.

2 posted on 05/19/2010 12:02:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ok where now is US Sen Webb of VA...crickets typical GUTLESS Dem BASTARD!


3 posted on 05/19/2010 12:02:53 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

He should be charged under the “Stolen Valor” law!


4 posted on 05/19/2010 12:05:56 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

Particularly after he had a chance to come clean and chose to continue to lie, as in how he was suddenly inspired to join the reserves but could have continued with his deferment.


5 posted on 05/19/2010 12:16:26 PM PDT by at bay (My father was born with 28 ounces of flesh in 1924 then went on to become Mr. (Glenn) Holland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Lt Col Oliver North's last sentence in that article is:

"Perhaps Democrats just have a higher tolerance for deceit."

Yes, deceit is their greatest tool--the truth is not in them.

6 posted on 05/19/2010 12:20:44 PM PDT by two23 (Everything about them is a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He should have been satisfied with saying that he fulfilled his military obligation. Deferments notwithstanding, he was not a draft dodger. I got out of the Army in 1963, technically before the start of the Vietnam era. Although we had Special Forces “advisors” in ‘Nam at that time, I always make it clear I was in and out before Vietnam and never left CA.


7 posted on 05/19/2010 12:21:18 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

My father-in-law served in the Army from 1938 until 1961. He never deployed during WWII and was always careful to say that he was not a WWII veteran. On the other hand, he was an advisor to the Korean Army in 1950 and would tell anyone in a heatbeat what it was like being there at that time and had the scars to show for it. He was most assuredly a part of the “Greatest Generation” as he never took credit for something he did not do, but was proud of what he did do.


8 posted on 05/19/2010 12:22:59 PM PDT by SLB (23rd Artillery Group, Republic of South Vietnam, Aug 1970 - Aug 1971.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This wasn't some "misstatement," this was a lie by a phony. You don't "come back" from Vietnam when your whole career was spent in the Reserves in the U.S.

And what ever happened to the Democrat/MSM view that anyone who got a deferment or joined the Reserves during Vietnam was a "draft dodger"???

9 posted on 05/19/2010 12:25:47 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

Yes, anyone ever in the military, including and especially Blumenthal, knows the distinction and the overwhelming majority don’t make the repeated slip of the tongue he has admittedly made. In my book he’s a liar!


10 posted on 05/19/2010 12:27:52 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It would be interesting to know how many Democrat veterans of the Vietnam War are still with Blumenthal. For many of these veterans, the “D” trumps the “V” for Vietnam.


11 posted on 05/19/2010 12:28:25 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Amen, Ollie


12 posted on 05/19/2010 12:29:03 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Good point on the “draft dodger” and see my post #10.


13 posted on 05/19/2010 12:29:39 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SLB

But he was available to be sent had the Army seen fit.

My kid was also available to be sent to Iraq or A’Stan but never got the call.

There is a lot to say for being in uniform, and able and willing to go in harms way.


14 posted on 05/19/2010 12:35:15 PM PDT by rahbert (Only a poor snake charmer blames his snake..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
CT Sen Poll: Blumenthal Lead Drops To 3

In the wake of the top-of-the-fold New York Times article calling out Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal for exaggerating his military record, his Republican opponents have made major gains since the last poll taken just two weeks ago.

--------------

He will continue to drop in the polls and hopefully lose. But the libs don't care how many lies he tells. He will support 0bama and that is all they care about.

15 posted on 05/19/2010 12:38:15 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Go get them Ollie.

Give 'em one for

ROBERT JOHN GASKO JR

PFC - E3 - Army - Selective Service

173rd Airborne Brigade

Length of service 0 years

His tour began on Nov 17, 1969

Casualty was on Jan 20, 1970

In BINH THUAN, SOUTH VIETNAM

HOSTILE, GROUND CASUALTY

GUN, SMALL ARMS FIRE

Body was recovered

Panel 14W - Line 49

16 posted on 05/19/2010 12:39:23 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Jazy, there were guys like this after every war. World War I and II were no different. I can't speak to his need to jump on the bandwagon now that we no longer mistreat our returning war veterans — certainly not from the noble vantage point of having served, but my uncles talked about the jackasses they'd meet who talked like major players, only to find out they weren't even on the field, much less in the game. The guys like my uncles (one at Omaha and Anzio driving the LSTs up on the beaches at both) NEVER EVER SPOKE of what they saw or had to do.

I'm sorry this guy was so insecure he had to borrow someone else’s honor to get elected, but it's not like he was the first. He's the son of WWII aged parents and all of them who fought were so careful to keep their precious kids out of Viet Nam (mostly because McArthur told them to NEVER EVER get involved in the war in Southeast Asia), so they got them away from the battle zone any way they could. This is unfortunate. He should have just been honest that when he finished school, it was all over but the spitting and mistreatment — something America should be very ashamed of.

17 posted on 05/19/2010 12:42:19 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I agree with you and SLB completely. No one who was in the military would make that "mistake."

Technically I was enlisted in the Reserves (in ROTC) during the last years of Vietnam and I have never, ever said I am a Vietnam vet.

18 posted on 05/19/2010 12:48:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

There was a UT Republican after World War II who lied about his war record and was booted out of Congress. I forget the details, but I believe his name was “Stringfellow”.


19 posted on 05/19/2010 12:48:21 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I love the way a deliberate, outright, offensive, often repeated, lie by a RAT is called a “misstatement”.


20 posted on 05/19/2010 12:50:59 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson