Posted on 05/18/2010 4:51:19 PM PDT by Tribune7
Just heard on Fox that Rand Paul won in Ky.
You clearly have no idea of what a libertarian is nor of what a libertarian believes, nor of the implications of libertarian beliefs. No idea. Does it not embarrass you a little to be pontificating on a subject about which you are so howlingly ignorant? You think Jesus thinks it is ok to lie for him, whether you do so deliberately or ignorantly?
Uh, hate to break it to you, but Paul hasn’t won the general election yet.
He’s going to need all the help he can get since yesterdays votes in Kentucky showed 168,000 more votes for Democrats than for Republicans.
And, I believe they only had a little over a 30% turn-out.
With some 520,000 more registered Democrats in the state, he is really going to have repackage Daddy’s message to fool that many.
And I am on record. I am unequivocally supporting his opponent in any and every race he ever runs in. I already spelled this out for you in no uncertain terms. But Paulists are notoriously thick. Next time maybe I'll try crayon and really big letters for you.
Another 2010 sign-up for the kook family...
At least we know what those money-bombs are buying (besides ads on the Alex Jones Show).
“As I said, “he’s got to get away from some of the more whackjob liberaltarian stuff that the old man started buying into.” Ron may be more than a little senile with some of the crap he came up with in ‘08.”
Understandable. However, Ron Paul has always held these principles, and not only since 2008. Moreover, he’s not bashful nor submissive when challenged regarding his principles. We all witnessed this when he didn’t cower in the debates when challenged by the cross dresser nor the other rinos on the stage. He stood his ground. Whether his stand is right or wrong is a matter of perception, as in the eyes of the beholder.
Should congress be forced to honor it’s constitutional duty to declare war? The constitution offers no well, maybe, ifs, there are no exceptions. Has the constitution been ignored before in war? Yes, but that does not negate the constitutional requirement as set forth.
Ron Paul is committed to the principle of congress’s constitutional duty before sending our fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters, off to make war. Some folks seek to argue with this constitutional requirement offering exceptions to the constitutional law as if it were some sort of living breathing document that should be flexible to roll with the flow. From what I have observed, Ron Paul is not one of them. Is he right? According to our constitution, he is absolutely right.
Principles... yes. That is what HAS to guide us....
Fear not. I'm not leaving the jungle anytime soon. ;-)
Another mouthpiece from the RNC. Do they pay you by the post, or by the word?
If you plan to support Conway... then, you're not much of a Conservative... more like, a troll.
The choice has changed now. Time to get OUT of the "circular firing squad" formation.
He certainly didn’t stand his ground on Medved and that was with friendly questioning; he was all over the map. And Paul’s theory of 9/11/01 being an “inside job” fits right in with Jeremiah Wright and Charlie Sheen.
The choice hasn’t changed for me. And it’s not going to. Not now, not ever.
I’m not concerned about my conservatism being questioned. If we’re at the point where conservatives are going to rally around a frequent guest on the Alex Jones Show — the Executive Producer of “Loose Change” and a man who’s made a cottage industry out of pissing on the graves of 3000 murdered Americans — conservatism as we know is dead, and the cause is hopelessly lost.
Ron (and Rand) Paul have consistently rejected the theory that 9-11 was an inside job. You may hate the Paul's but that's no excuse for making things up. If you intend to make a guilt by association argument in response don't bother. Just because some truthers support Paul and some birthers support Palin doesn't mean that either is a truther or birth.
And of course everyone knows you are lying, including you. Don't let that stop you,though. Maybe you could practice the art to perfection and then pull a Specter and find the folks that appreciate that art form over on that side of things. They have a real appreciation for it. In the meantime, You lie.
Lie is right. It just shows the weakness of the Paul haters that they have to make things up. Paul has repeatedly said that Bin Laden did it. The only response of the Paul haters is to make guilt by association arguments.
You got me pegged, Paulbot. I’m working for The Man. He’s a Zionist, too. [shudder]
Go find that link. I'll wait.
Well, you can hardly blame me for assuming so. You seething little pus balls of hatred never had an original thought in your lives, but sound like a turn crank victrola, mouthing off those incredibly lame platitudes..... "Paulbot" huh? Just bugs the sh!t out of you people that we don't genuflect at the altar of statism as long as it has an "R" in front of it, huh? Stupid gratuitous anti semitic slur at the end. So typical.
Paul's stand was (and is) that Islamists attack us because our foreign policy agitates them. It's an historically indefensible position. Islamists have been attacking non-Islamists since they crawled out of the slime for one reason: the Satanic handbook delivered by their murderous prophet compels them to. They have a religious duty to be an existential threat to western civilization.
Thomas Jefferson figured this out in 1785. Maybe one of these days, Ron Paul will too. But I won't be holding my breath.
When you get through licking the RNC’s..... uh, “hand” like the good little lapdog you are, you might try checking the interveiew with Ron Paul where he was actually ASKED if he subscribed to any of that stuff. Of course, we know that is NEVER going to be pure enough for you guys. Nope, Ron Paul must, to be PURE ENOUGH, go on to a radio show as a guest and correct every looney idea Alex Jones ever had.
Never mind that the republican crack whores you support climb into a giant orgy of dissipate spending and freedom auctions and don’t say a WORD about it. Hell, after all, what federal tit would you people suck off if we actually DID what that bag of dissimulating scum swallowing “sell my momma” leadership in the Republican party PROMISES to do every time they smell a chance at power?
I think it is time for you guys to attack my sign up date.....
I would hate for you to miss your cue.
It would be an indefensible position if that was the sum and total of the position..... but it is not. I have that part figured out. What I don't yet know is whether you know it and are just so fixated on Ron/Rand Paul that you know it and just don't care but will tell any lie you can to make him look bad OR You are so stupid you really think that because Paul does believe that our presence in the Middle East is an exacerbation to Islamic fundamentalism, this means that he thinks that if we withdrew our problems with Islam would be over. I am having a difficult time figuring out which bag of slop someone has actually fed you, though it is clear that one of them is true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.