Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Cameron: second home owners deserve higher taxes
Daily Telegraph ^ | May 17, 2010 | Rosa Prince

Posted on 05/18/2010 7:13:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The Prime Minister suggested that second homes deserved to be hit by increased capital gains taxes because such properties were not ''splendid'' for the economy.

Mr Cameron also confirmed he had been forced to ditch a number of Conservative policies to enlist the Liberal Democrats in a coalition Government, and conceded that he would lose some traditional Tory supporters as a result.

He defended the change in policy, which is expected to see capital gains tax (CGT) for second-home owners and shareholders rise from 18 per cent towards 40 or even 50 per cent. It is designed to pay for a Lib Dem plan to reduce income tax for the low paid.

Under the terms of the coalition agreement, the Conservatives have dropped plans to raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million. Mr Cameron confirmed that he was likely to give way to Lib Dem demands that middle-income families be stripped of child tax credits.

In sentiments likely to irritate the Right of his party, he suggested that higher capital gains taxes were justified as part of the "fairness agenda".

Asked if the CGT plans were a betrayal of "hardworking, Conservative families", Mr Cameron said entrepreneurs would be protected from the tax, but that second-home owners should expect to pay more. "There is a very big difference between the capital gains that someone pays on, say, a second home – which is not necessarily a splendid investment for the whole economy – there's a difference between that and actual investment in business assets," he said.

"So we've said that we're going to look at a different rate between those two things and that helps actually again the fairness agenda. That helps us achieve the goal of lifting tax allowances, so we take more people out of tax."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cameron; capitalgainstaxes; davidcameron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Cameron disgusts me, and I hope we don't nominate such a squish in 2012. If you own a 2nd home for 20 years and sell at a profit, much of the "capital gain" just reflects inflation, which is itself created by government policies. Cameron thinks such illusory gains should be taxed at rates up to 50%.
1 posted on 05/18/2010 7:13:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Cameron is already going left.


2 posted on 05/18/2010 7:14:57 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

You had me until you said “profit.” Then I realized you were a greedy evil capitalist. /sarc


3 posted on 05/18/2010 7:15:38 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So much for the British view of capitalism.

Cameron is a lot like many other folks who talk a good game before they get elected and then do just the opposite when they get in.

Disgusting. Absolutely disgraceful.

If I were the British people, I’d be spitting nails right about now.


4 posted on 05/18/2010 7:16:41 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The Prime Minister suggested that second homes deserved to be hit by increased capital gains taxes because such properties were not ''splendid'' for the economy.

Yes they are "splendid for the economy" you pinko sissy-ass limey.

When only a single home is built/sold/bought, in addition to many people being employed, a great deal of goods and services are sold and exchanged.

5 posted on 05/18/2010 7:19:47 AM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

All UK threads should be posted along with a graphic of a roast with a fork sticking out of it.


6 posted on 05/18/2010 7:20:31 AM PDT by junta (S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What an @$$hole.


7 posted on 05/18/2010 7:20:35 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

There aren’t any real conservatives in the UK.
The second home market is an industry just like anything else. The rich buy a property in Wales..spend money to remodel and expand it and employee people to keep it rnning. If all the rich stopped buying second homes a lot of people will be out of work..oh well..I guess they already know that and don’t care. It get’s them votes in the slums.


8 posted on 05/18/2010 7:21:25 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

more left wing policies, just means UK will never come out of their downturn. In fact it may even get worst as a result and Conservatives will lose the next election because the voters will blame the state of the economy on the Conservatives, handing victory to the Labor party again


9 posted on 05/18/2010 7:22:16 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This is not my definition of conservative.

Some days it’s hard not to get discouraged.


10 posted on 05/18/2010 7:22:36 AM PDT by JustSurrounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
He defended the change in policy, which is expected to see capital gains tax (CGT) for second-home owners and shareholders rise from 18 per cent towards 40 or even 50 per cent. It is designed to pay for a Lib Dem plan to reduce income tax for the low paid.

If those are the Chamberlain levels of surrender he needs to make to get a coalition government, it might be better if he declares failure and they hold a new election (is that the way things work in Britain?). I guess the only risk is that Labour and the Liberals might be able to create a coalition government without the need for those elections.

And if they do bump the capital gains tax from 18% to 40%, expect a huge drop in the British stock market as everyone sells to lock in their gains at the current rate.

11 posted on 05/18/2010 7:23:16 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (I am so immune to satire that I ate three Irish children after reading Swift's "A Modest Proposal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Cam deserves a rap in the nuts.


12 posted on 05/18/2010 7:23:20 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

....assuming he has any.


13 posted on 05/18/2010 7:25:32 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

That didn’t take very long.....


14 posted on 05/18/2010 7:29:49 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Always pick on the achievers and call for more taxes on achievers. The unwritten tax rule of taxing something to get less. Pretty soon you will have less achievers, then who will they tax?


15 posted on 05/18/2010 7:47:44 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

RINO of all RINOs.

Or is it TINO?


16 posted on 05/18/2010 7:53:19 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("young people, African-Americans, Latinos and women; teabaggers"-0 Ageist Racist Sexist Homophobic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSurrounded

He’s no Margaret Thatcher, that’s for sure. She might be the last true British conservative.


17 posted on 05/18/2010 7:57:32 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
It would seem that Britain had a choice between three Marxists. Maybe Brown should have been reelected so the destruction could be completed quicker.
18 posted on 05/18/2010 8:14:27 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What a TINO (Tory In Name Only).


19 posted on 05/18/2010 8:41:34 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
The second home market is an industry just like anything else. The rich buy a property in Wales..spend money to remodel and expand it and employee people to keep it rnning. If all the rich stopped buying second homes a lot of people will be out of work.

It's a bit more complicated than that. What happens in desirable rural areas (such as the south-west, where I live), is that second-home owners whose primary residence is, say, London artificially inflate the local property market, putting owning a home beyond the reach of young, local first-time buyers, who therefore migrate from the area towards the cities. At the same time the second-home owners are usually only in residence during summer weekends: so that, although as you say there is local employment in construction etc, a lot of the rest of the local economy suffers simply because for much of the year there's nobody around to buy local services. Hence closure of village stores, post offices, pubs etc. The net result is that in some areas we have 'ghost villages', empty for much of the year - and all too often when the second-home owners finally arrive in the summer, they bring most of their supplies with them.

There's a genuine problem for our rural economy here - but needless to say, fiddling with taxation isn't a solution.

20 posted on 05/18/2010 8:46:11 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson