DeVore needs your help!

http://anystreet.org/about.php ^

[MollyKuehl]

AnyStreet is on a mission to help Chuck Devore get elected in California to boot Boxer out! Your help is needed to make this happen! We need every seat possible to turn RED in the Senate!

Do it from your home! Use your land line, use your cell phone! Scripts & lists will be provided.

Simply email Call4Devore@anystreet.org now, and you will be provided with the details.

The momentum is building for this great candidate. Together, we can make this happen!

[MollyKuehl]

LET'S HELP DEVORE BRING CONSERVATISM BACK TO CALIFORNIA AND THE SENATE!

[IntolerantOfTreason]

I don’t get why everybody’s raving about DeVore. It’s especially amusing that he’s characterised as being the guy to beat the RINOs.

http://www.themidnightreview.com/2010/04/chuck-devore-distances-himself-from.html - DeVore doesn’t give a s**t about the Constitution either, and only pays lip service to keep people happy who aren’t paying close attention.

STOP VOTING FOR RINOs

[G Larry]

Hey CHUCK!
Help by GETTING OUT OF THE WAY!

Then you’ll earn the loyalty necessary to attain a congressional seat.

Fiorina is head and shoulders above Campbell, and Carley can beat Boxer!

[Carry_Okie]

I offered.

He didn't take it.

[Carry_Okie]

Help by GETTING OUT OF THE WAY!

Of whom, pray tell? A globalist put-up? A whore for cap and trade? Somebody who would regulate the Internet?

[G Larry]

Of somebody who can beat Campbell and Boxer!

Chuck will fail!

[MollyKuehl]

Why don't you start your own thread and title it "We like supporting the RINOs of the likes of Fiorino"? You'll be better fitted there.

Fiorino's record:
* supported the Wall Street bailouts
* supported C&T
* supported Sotomayor confirmation
* criticized AZ immigration law
* while with HP, before being fired she allowed tech sale to Iran
* had "no comments" last yr regarding the massive tax increase in CA

She's the female equivalent of Charlie Crist. She should do California a favor and register as what she truly is: a Democrat.

[G Larry]

She’s more conservative than Campbell and Boxer and can win.
Chuck can’t!

[MollyKuehl]

Of somebody who can beat Campbell and Boxer!

You sure are the ideal GOP voter: vote for anyone who has (R) behind their names if they have a chance to win. That is precisely what brought us into this situation: we kept compromising on real conservative values "just to get the vote" and RINOs have taken over. Voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still voting for evil.

[IntolerantOfTreason]

No disagreement with your comments about Fiorino. So what you’re saying is that Fiorino is *more* of a RINO than DeVore, so we should support the lesser of two evils? No thanks, I’m done with that game.

Does a candidate believe in the Constitution? That is one of the key questions that determines who I support, rather than just “durrrr, gonna vote that guy because he says he’s (R)”.

[IntolerantOfTreason]

OK, you’re confusing me now ... I made my last comment before reading this one. I agree that we should stand by conservative principles, and that voting for the lesser of two evils is wrong. So why DeVore? Why even stick with the Republican party?

[MollyKuehl]

Thus far you have offered me platitudes and general statements. How about being specific on your RINO charges against Mr. DeVore???? I offered just a few regarding Fiorino. Her list could go on...

[MollyKuehl]

It is not the Republican party, it is the conservative values. Visit his site, do your own research. I did, on both candidates. The answer is obvious.

[IntolerantOfTreason]

See my first comment here (number 2), with link. Does the Constitution mean anything to him? You can’t pick and choose, and say that as a conservative some parts of the Constitution are great, while deriding people who support enforcing another part of the Constitution as “crazies”.

[G Larry]

And a vote for Chuck is a waste of time.

I don’t need your lectures on the path to a more conservative House and Senate.

[MollyKuehl]

He is not the only one distancing himself from the birthers. Many conservatives have done so simply because the efforts can be put into something relevant. Point and case: even if the Obamessiah himself comes out on national television and admits his BC is a fraud, that he's Kenyan born, it will not make a difference since his supporters will never accept as being the truth. The issues regarding the CA election is not Obama's BC but Obama and his marxist croonies. I believe that the ones doing the right thing about this issue is the likes of Rev Manning and Orly Ortiz and Farah etc who are relentless in their search for truth.

Candidates should concentrate on the issues at hand. And if your only argument is the fact the birther issue, than it's disappointing.

[Carry_Okie]

Of somebody who can beat Campbell and Boxer!

Oh goody, "sHe can win." Is a golden parachute all you've got?

My bet is you're a consultant looking to get a piece of it.

Chuck will fail!

IBTZ. Cleanup on aisle three...

[MollyKuehl]

I don’t need your lectures on the path to a more conservative House and Senate.

FReeping while unmedicated is challenging and it shows by your posts. You're the one who jumped on MY thread, preaching to me about Carly, the real "conservative" out there. Are you really such a hypocrite?

[IntolerantOfTreason]

Ignoring the issue is one thing; I’m not going to argue prioritization, it’s a tricky issue. But it’s quite another thing to actively ridicule and spurn the people pushing the issue - that indicates that it’s not a matter of priorities, but actively spurning the Constitution.

If we have a properly conservative house and senate come November, then the pretender can be IMPEACHED. Where’s your defeatism now?

“your only argument is in fact the birther issue” - so it’s just trivial? The Constitution is very very important; a true conservative would understand this.

[MollyKuehl]

No, the birther issue is by far trivial and it has nothing to do with the constitution or the..truth for that matter. The Obama administration and the Axelrods of the world ENJOY seeing us argue over this. This is a a schism of the highest order and it's purposely done to separate a group of unified people (CONSERVATIVES) into groups. And we argue. We throw our attention off the real issues. Why do you think they keep throwing at us the ongoing charges of racism and homophobia? Again, to take our focus away from what is happening. It is such an old tactic and it's time we recognize it for what it is and allow the Mannings and the Ortiz and the Farahs do what they do and, at the same time, stop attacking candidates for not taking on this issue.

It's a an issue meant to separate us and the sooner people understand this, the better we'll be.