Posted on 05/17/2010 6:25:48 PM PDT by raptor22
Writing in the New Republic, Colorado University law professor Paul Campos called President Obama's pick for the Supreme Court a "blank slate." Elena Kagan has no judicial experience and no paper trail of thoughtful legal opinions to merit any consideration for a seat on the highest court of the land.
Recent history has taught us a lot about "blank slates." President Obama had a shallow resume and virtually no paper trail when he fooled many voters into believing he shared their philosophical viewpoints. In the past 16 months, he's filled that slate with socialist policies that have outraged a majority of voters and cost him dearly in public support.
Most Americans are incensed by his "you've had enough, America" brand of redistributive governance. Consider these unguarded Obama statements:
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
And gay, to boot.
Are we going to convince Sen. Kyle to block this travesty or are we just pissing into the wind?
She's a Marxist-Socialist/Communist. Given the opportunity she'll disarm us and enslave us.
THAT IS WHAT I CARE ABOUT!
Ditto, big time. Gay is nothing compared to what this enemy of America plans on doing from the SCOTUS bench.
But about that Jovian cloud -squid...
The One continues to expand his cadre of Inner Party members. They in turn will seek out and eradicate any records unfavorable to him and themselves as they gain ever greater control of us, “the prols.”
In time the language will be perfect.
Female Obama
Even the lefty rat Kagan isn't afraid of a baseball.
“I don’t care if she’s gay.”
Same-sex attraction disorder has psychological, sexual, intellectual, and spiritual components. Sufferers cannot compartmentalize it. A person who suffers from SSAD is at risk of making a foray into irrationality at any time, on any subject.
No one with SSAD should occupy any responsible position, any more than should a person suffering from schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, or any other mental disorder.
“This problem we have with Tuttle...er...BUTTLE...damn it!”
LOL...sorry. Obscure “Brazil” reference...
But I agree 100% with your post!
Seems the chosen one prefers gays in his hierarchy.
The list of czars (needs updating) have a number of openly gay people in power over our lives. http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/29391/
And this ‘blank slate”? She’s a clone of 0bama—no experience, no paper trail. http://www.theobamafile.com/BarackObama.htm but matching in radical, leftist ideology.
I don’t know where you came up with ssad disease. Never heard of it. I don’t agree that ss should never hold a position of great importance. There are some very brilliant folks who are gay. She is just not one of them!
“I dont know where you came up with ssad disease.”
Didn’t use the word “disease.” It is called same-sex attraction disorder, and I didn’t come up with the term. As lust for members of one’s own sex has been recognized as disordered for all of known history, I obviously didn’t invent that either.
“Never heard of it.”
Now you don’t have that excuse any more.
“I dont agree that ss should never hold a position of great importance.”
Then you need to study the matter more.
“There are some very brilliant folks who are gay.”
Irrelevant.
No, worse than irrelevant: misleading. Brilliance by itself is not a recommendation for high office. The ability to think rationally on all subjects and a properly formed conscience are paramount. SSAD precludes both of those conditions.
“I dont know where you came up with ssad disease.”
Didn’t use the word “disease.” It is called same-sex attraction disorder, and I didn’t come up with the term. As lust for members of one’s own sex has been recognized as disordered for all of known history, I obviously didn’t invent that either.
“Never heard of it.”
Now you don’t have that excuse any more.
“I dont agree that ss should never hold a position of great importance.”
Then you need to study the matter more.
“There are some very brilliant folks who are gay.”
Irrelevant.
No, worse than irrelevant: misleading. Brilliance by itself is not a recommendation for high office. The ability to think rationally on all subjects and a properly formed conscience are paramount. SSAD precludes both of those conditions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.