Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House panel supports bigger raise than requested for military
Washington Post ^ | May 14, 2010 | Ed O'Keefe

Posted on 05/17/2010 5:04:44 AM PDT by Poundstone

Lawmakers disregarded Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates's calls for fiscal restraint Wednesday, approving a military pay raise higher than President Obama and the Pentagon requested.

The House Armed Services personnel subcommittee approved a 1.9 percent pay bump for uniformed military personnel, half of a percentage point higher than suggested in Obama's fiscal 2011 budget. The markup also increased hostile-fire pay and family separation allowances.

"This raise will further reduce the gap between military and private-sector pay raises," said subcommittee chairman Susan A. Davis (D-Calif.).

But the raise is in direct disagreement with the wishes of Gates, who plans to push for at least $15 billion in cuts from the Pentagon's budget, mostly from contracts and administrative redundancies.

Speaking Saturday in Kansas, the secretary raised particular concern with military personnel costs, saying that health-care expenses totaling about $50 billion "are eating the Defense Department alive." The sum roughly equals the State Department's entire foreign affairs and assistance budget, Gates said.

Davis said she's open to working with Gates on his cost concerns but kept the proposed pay raise intact.

The military pay bump means civilian federal workers could see a similar raise next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: federal; military; pay; workers
So federal civilian employees will get, at most, a 1.9 percent pay raise next year. Not much. Hmmm... glad I retired this month from the federal government, with a full pension and a follow-on job.
1 posted on 05/17/2010 5:04:45 AM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

It is a pretty big raise. I recommend we fund it however, and we do so responsibly; eliminate the Legal Services Administration, the National Endowment for the Arts and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, divert the funds to this purpose and call it a wash. Now, as for the Departments of Energy and Education...


2 posted on 05/17/2010 5:11:03 AM PDT by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

If congress is limited to a 1.9% pay raise, Pelosi and her staff might have to stop ordering the good scotch for the office stash


3 posted on 05/17/2010 5:31:24 AM PDT by silverleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

Don’t forget Transportation, Agriculture, the EPA, and HUD.


4 posted on 05/17/2010 5:34:32 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
Correcting Headline - to what it should say:

House panel supports smallest pay raise in years for military

A little Googleign tells the whole truth. I could of gone back further, and I bet the story would of been the same.

2004 4.1
2005 3.5
2006 3.1
2007 2.2
2008 3.5

5 posted on 05/17/2010 5:35:38 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
Obama ask for low ball 1.5 % and its gets bumped up to a 1.9% and headlines praise Obama with “Obama signs bigger that asked for pay raise”

Yet in 2008 Bush asked for half a percent less than what was being asked taking it from 3.9% to 3.5% and he gets ripped for slashing military pay. Hmmmmmm whats is bigger 3.5 or 1.9?

6 posted on 05/17/2010 6:06:38 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
"This raise will further reduce the gap between military and private-sector pay raises," said subcommittee chairman Susan A. Davis (D-Calif.).

Not to disparage our military, but most private-sector employees I know aren't getting pay raises. And many have had their salaries cut.

7 posted on 05/17/2010 6:10:32 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

Can anyone on FR tell me if this bill corrected the TriCare dependent eligibility gap between age 22 and 26 in comparison to the coming ObamaCare law?

Info for a family friend, thanks


8 posted on 05/17/2010 6:16:31 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

1.9% pay raise for the Military is a CHEESY pay raise they risk their lives for our freedom.

Gates sits in a cushy office, makes 6 figures and isn’t getting shot at daily. CUT HIS PAY. If there is an issue with command structure that is a paper work issue, not a pay raise issue. That Gates can fix with a stroke of the pen.


9 posted on 05/17/2010 7:24:39 AM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

BINGO!

Wife of retired Senior Chief.

We received NO COLA raise this year and will not for 3-4 years, ditto for SS COLA’s.


10 posted on 05/17/2010 7:27:07 AM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
“Not to disparage our military, but most private-sector employees I know aren't getting pay raises.”

I can't think of any of those private-sector employees being asked to leave their families for six to nine months at a time, every year of their enlistment, and many of them going to a hostile war zone.

Granted, in tough economic times, looking for a pay raise from the boss when he is just trying to keep his doors open in not likely. But a 1.9% increase for the military, that falls way behind the Cost of Living is a slap in the face.
And then see how clever they are writing headlines - singing praises to the One

11 posted on 05/17/2010 7:44:34 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson