Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just not that into Dems: America's Obama crush was never true love
NY Post ^ | May 13, 2010 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 05/17/2010 3:54:52 AM PDT by Scanian

WASHINGTON -- The really amazing thing about the ongoing po litical purge we are seeing across the country is the genuine shock and hurt felt by the ousted.

Pink-slipped in a West Virginia primary Tuesday, 14-term Congressman Alan Mollohan cried, "Right-wing smears!"

It is like they still don't get the anger, frustration and weariness voters have with self-obsessed Washington, pandering politicians and the big, fat, dumb federal government.

This is especially true of Democrats around here, who are riding high on so much euphoria from President Obama's historic victory. They actually thought it was true love.

As if American voters lost all their wits and suddenly embraced soft liberalism and bigger government.

What actually happened in 2008 -- and Obama brilliantly tapped into this -- was not an embrace of Democrats but a rejection of Washington and the government. It was the "change," stupid!

As it happened at that time, Republicans were still the face of Washington and had been for a long time. So it was Republicans that voters so swiftly dumped.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; democrats; liberalagenda; mollahan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2010 3:54:52 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57tK6aQS_H0


2 posted on 05/17/2010 3:59:34 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("I'll retire to Bedlam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“So it was Republicans that voters so swiftly dumped.”

In so doing, the idiot voters sold their soul to the devil.
Sadly, it may very well be a one way ticket to Hell.


3 posted on 05/17/2010 4:01:38 AM PDT by AlexW (Now in the Philippines . Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
it was never about being a Republican or a Democrat, but the incumbent.

As if American voters lost all their wits and suddenly embraced soft liberalism and bigger government.

No, it's a little bit about being a Republican or a Democrat as long as being a Republican means being AGAINST "soft liberalism and bigger government."

4 posted on 05/17/2010 4:13:10 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Congressman Alan Mollohan: It was not the vast right wing conspiracy-It was your support of bad Dem legislation.
To the rest of the Dems-It’s too late to apologize, It’s just too late.


5 posted on 05/17/2010 4:17:17 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

No, it is about being the incumbant. Pubbies are every bit as much the problem as their Dimmie counterparts.
The Republican leadership still does not get it. Their establishmentarianism is counterpoint to Democrat statism. Both ideologies need to go.


6 posted on 05/17/2010 4:20:32 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The reactions of people like Mollohan really irritate me. He acts as though he has a right to make a living for the rest of his life as a politician. No one should. Ever. There should be no career politicians in the US. It's supposed to be public service, not a career. I have less than zero respect for these parasites.
7 posted on 05/17/2010 4:25:29 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

No, it’s about liberalism and big Gov (as I said). We are in violent agreement here. If a Republican embraces that, they’re in trouble. If a Republican rejects that, they’re not in trouble. If it were just about being an incumbent, then voters would just be crazy and illogical and that’s something the Democrats want you to believe when they try to dismiss it as just being anti-incumbent.


8 posted on 05/17/2010 4:27:38 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

Amen. ;0)


9 posted on 05/17/2010 4:31:11 AM PDT by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“Obama Crush Was Never True Love”

They knew about Mr. Ayres. They knew about attendance at a church that espoused vicious anti-American hatred. They knew about the proposed national security force that would be “just as well organized and financed as the military”.
They knew about the re-distribution of wealth, about ties to violent, extreme left-wing organizations. They saw the videos of the “Obama youth” chanting the benefits of Obama, and they saw the young children singing the praises of Obama by way of a song written by rabid Obama supporters.

Love affair? Nah. Just the promise of a flurry of dollars, no matter how acquired, was the “love affair”; the satisfying villification of the “rich” and the destructive elements of envy applied by willing representatives elected by a hateful population, who were manipulated into thinking they were intellectual giants by a psychotic press.

(And watch them all vote the same way in November.)

IMHO


10 posted on 05/17/2010 4:54:35 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

“If it were just about being an incumbent, then voters would just be crazy and illogical and that’s something the Democrats want you to believe when they try to dismiss it as just being anti-incumbent.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

True, South Carolina has two republican senators, Demint is winning national respect while Graham is winning national derision. If both were on the ballot this year Demint would probably be reelected in a landslide while Graham might very well be voted out.


11 posted on 05/17/2010 5:04:57 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

Let’s not leave out the corruption and nepotism either.


12 posted on 05/17/2010 5:08:31 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ripley

You and I knew about those things! Be aware that a huge percentage of Obama voters seem to have been totally UNAWARE of most or all of that and many still seem to be unaware. I was amazed during the election at how many people seemed to not know basic things such as that he had a white mother or that his alleged father was not an American. It is dangerous to underestimate the average voter’s capacity to remain totally ignorant in the midst of an information overload.

A huge percentage of Obama voters, probably a majority even cannot tell you the century when the American civil war was fought, that’s right I said CENTURY, not years. Many or most could not tell you what the American Revolution even was, let alone what the issues were or when it happened or what country we fought against. Mention a name like Cornwallis or Tarleton and they probably think you are naming cigarette brands.


13 posted on 05/17/2010 5:12:43 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt....


14 posted on 05/17/2010 5:15:00 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
As if American voters lost all their wits and suddenly embraced soft liberalism and bigger government.

Wellll... I'm not convinced they haven't. We'll know by midnight of the first Tuesday night in November exactly what kind of country we are.

15 posted on 05/17/2010 5:42:17 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

“It is dangerous to underestimate the average voter’s capacity to remain totally ignorant in the midst of an information overload.”

It is equally dangerous to think of the average voter as a kindergartener in adult’s clothing.

They know exactly what they’re about and they know where the current crop of revolutionary Democrats wants to lead them.

(respectfully), IMHO


16 posted on 05/17/2010 5:44:18 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
Be aware that a huge percentage of Obama voters seem to have been totally UNAWARE of most or all of that and many still seem to be unaware.

That's the rub.. they don't CARE. The facts and details don't matter to them. What matters to them is that 0bama IS. To them, what he says is truth and all else is right-wing lies.

To us clear-thinking and pragmatic folk, the idea of an 0bama presidency is abhorrent, because we know what he stands for. We know he's a not-so-closeted Marxist who wants to fundamentally and radically change this country on the Euro-socialist model.

The libs see 0bama as this transformation figure who would rise Messiah-like over us all and create a milk-and-honey, post-racial, and frankly post-America, one-world utopia. To them, 0bama is not a political leader; rather he's their guiding light of their faith. In a cult-like trance, they hang on his every word as gospel; some faint while others' faces stream with tears. Look at the close-up pics of his followers in the crowd shots from the 2008 campaign. These people look like they've found manna from Heaven when they cast their eyes on 0bama.

Very, very weird.

17 posted on 05/17/2010 5:55:36 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

I think 5 years from today it will be obvious what has happened. This is the great purge against all incumbents and it didn't start this year. It started in 08. The republicans were purged and that process continues today in the primaries. This year the rat party is starting it's purge and will bleed over into 2012. Obama will not know how to adapt to the new washington that is coming because he is part of the old fat cat backroom enmtittled elites who have run our country into the dirt. He will face a miserable beating in 2012.


18 posted on 05/17/2010 6:50:04 AM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

It's the waking of the silent sleeping giant , the vast majority of a center right country who have awaken to a country worst off after 8 years of Bush liberalism (ok , he gave us judges). They decided to purge the rinos in 08 and deal with the rats in 2010 and what is left of rats and rino's in 2012.


19 posted on 05/17/2010 6:55:27 AM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH
He will face a miserable beating in 2012.

I certainly hope so, but I have learned not to underestimate the stupidity of at least 48% of the voters in this country. Further, while I'd like to see him take a beating in 2012, but currently I don't see anyone who can pull in the votes on the GOP side to knock him off.

20 posted on 05/17/2010 7:14:41 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson