"A word of advice to union leaders: The assault on real Americans is not without consequence. You too can be isolated, marginalized, and easily replaced."
Popcorn, anyone?
I grew up in a union family.
The union newsletters spewed political venom that seldom was in the best interests of the rank-and-file.
And this was 30+ years ago. I can’t imagine how out-of-touch they must be today.
Rank and file members in Arizona are forced into a position of choosing between their socialist bosses or their state.
Frankly, I have no idea why the rank and file have not been bitching about this for years. Why on earth would they support illegal immigration which would simply dry up jobs and depress wages? From the perspective of the Union leadership I can see why; they just want more dues paying members.
RANK AND FILE.................... WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
None of my union friends support amnesty, they know it does them no good.
BTT
NOTICE! AFL-CIO leadership supports low paid illegal alien SCABBS taking jobs away from the Union rank and file!
Now that would make a great headline!
My Union President Harold Shitberger has been fellating the Democrats since day one.
Anyone who belongs to a union by choice is a sucker.
Union members now have a new title.....”SUCKAS.”
Time for the union slaves to rise up against their masters. Decertification isn’t just something they do in... well anywhere.
This is a simple issue.
Illegal aliens take jobs about from workers. It’s just a fact. Unemployment approaches 20% nationwide and union or non-union, they realize that their jobs and the job opportunities for their children are seriously undercut by illegal employment.
They get paid under the table. They accept serf-level wages. They don’t pay into the system.
And here’s the kicker — if you let this become generational, it WILL LOWER EVERYONE TO SERF-LEVEL standards of living.
Illegal immigration threatens prosperity and the American way of life.
And we’ve not talked of terrorist infiltration and drug lords running drugs across borders.
Reality vs. Myth: SB1070
Myth No. 1: The law requires aliens to carry identification that they weren’t already required to carry.
Reality: It has been a federal crime (8 United States Code Section 1304(a) or 1306(e)) since 1940 for aliens to fail to carry their registration documents. The Arizona law reaffirms the federal law. Anyone who has traveled abroad knows that other nations have similar requirements. The majority requests for documentation will take place during the course of other police business such as traffic stops. Because Arizona allows only lawful residents to obtain licenses, an officer must presume that someone who produces one is legally in the country. (See News Hour clip 3:45 seconds in)
Myth No. 2: The law will encourage racial profiling.
Reality: The Arizona law reduces the chances of racial profiling by requiring officers to contact the federal government when they suspect a person is an illegal alien as opposed to letting them make arrests on their own assessment as federal law currently allows. Section 2 was amended (by HB2162) to read that a law enforcement official “may not consider race, color, or national origin” in making any stops or determining an alien’s immigration status (previously, they were prohibited in “solely” considering those factors). In addition, all of the normal Fourth Amendment protections against racial profiling still apply.
Myth No. 3: “Reasonable suspicion” is a meaningless term that will permit police misconduct.
Reality: “Reasonable suspicion” has been defined by the courts for decades (the Fourth Amendment itself proscribes “unreasonable searches and seizures”). One of the most recent cases, Estrada v. Rhode Island, provides an example of the courts refining of “reasonable suspicion:”
A 15 passenger van is pulled over for a traffic violation. The driver of the van had identification but the other passengers did not (some had IDs from a gym membership, a non-driver’s license card from the state, and IDs issued from the Guatemalan Consulate). The passengers said they were on their way to work but they had no work permits. Most could not speak English but upon questioning, admitted that they were in the United States illegally. The officer notified ICE and waited three minutes for instructions.
The SB1070 provision in question reads:
“For any lawful contact made by a law enforcement official or agency of this state . . . where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person.”
Myth No. 4: The law will require Arizona police officers to stop and question people.
Reality: The law only kicks in when a police officer stopped, detained, or arrested someone (HB2162). The most likely contact is during the issuance of a speeding ticket. The law does not require the officer to begin questioning a person about his immigration status or to do anything the officer would not otherwise do.
Only after a stop is made, and subsequently the officer develops reasonable suspicion on his own that an immigration law has been violated, is any obligation imposed. At that point, the officer is required to call ICE to confirm whether the person is an illegal alien.
The Arizona law is actually more restrictive than federal law. In Muehler v. Mena (2005), the Supreme Court ruled that officers did not need reasonable suspicion to justify asking a suspect about their immigration status, stating that the court has “held repeatedly that mere police questioning does not constitute a seizure” under the Fourth Amendment). Source = http://www.numbersusa.com/dfax?jid=475466&lid=9&rid=123&series=tp06MAY10&tid=999725
What is scary is that Liberal RINOs who are Open Borders/Pro-Illegal/Anti-American....SUPPORT THE AFL-CIO LEADERSHIP on this issue.
Every RINO who supports Open Borders and Illegal Aliens are doing the bidding of the Unions......and, how the GOP could break up the unions by supporting Americans over Illegal Aliens.
When an Open Borders RINO claims that he is anti-Union....but supports Amnesty....the RINO is lying twice
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka = Organized Crime.
Union members, take the elitist AFL-CIO Princes to task with this.
Make it illegal in the State of Arizona for an alien to not register with the government, thus being an “illegal alien” (already the case at the federal level: 8 USC 1306a; USC 1304e)
Allow police to detain people where there is a “reasonable suspicion” that they’re illegal aliens (see the recent court case Estrada v. Rhode Island for an idea of what “reasonable suspicion” might entail)
Prohibits sanctuary cities (already prohibited at the federal level, 8 USC 1373) and allows citizens to sue any such jurisdiction
Reality vs. Myth: SB1070
Myth No. 1: The law requires aliens to carry identification that they weren’t already required to carry.
Reality: It has been a federal crime (8 United States Code Section 1304(a) or 1306(e)) since 1940 for aliens to fail to carry their registration documents. The Arizona law reaffirms the federal law. Anyone who has traveled abroad knows that other nations have similar requirements. The majority requests for documentation will take place during the course of other police business such as traffic stops. Because Arizona allows only lawful residents to obtain licenses, an officer must presume that someone who produces one is legally in the country. (See News Hour clip 3:45 seconds in)
Myth No. 2: The law will encourage racial profiling.
Reality: The Arizona law reduces the chances of racial profiling by requiring officers to contact the federal government when they suspect a person is an illegal alien as opposed to letting them make arrests on their own assessment as federal law currently allows. Section 2 was amended (by HB2162) to read that a law enforcement official “may not consider race, color, or national origin” in making any stops or determining an alien’s immigration status (previously, they were prohibited in “solely” considering those factors). In addition, all of the normal Fourth Amendment protections against racial profiling still apply.
Myth No. 3: “Reasonable suspicion” is a meaningless term that will permit police misconduct.
Reality: “Reasonable suspicion” has been defined by the courts for decades (the Fourth Amendment itself proscribes “unreasonable searches and seizures”). One of the most recent cases, Estrada v. Rhode Island, provides an example of the courts refining of “reasonable suspicion:”
A 15 passenger van is pulled over for a traffic violation. The driver of the van had identification but the other passengers did not (some had IDs from a gym membership, a non-driver’s license card from the state, and IDs issued from the Guatemalan Consulate). The passengers said they were on their way to work but they had no work permits. Most could not speak English but upon questioning, admitted that they were in the United States illegally. The officer notified ICE and waited three minutes for instructions.
The SB1070 provision in question reads:
“For any lawful contact made by a law enforcement official or agency of this state . . . where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person.”
Myth No. 4: The law will require Arizona police officers to stop and question people.
Reality: The law only kicks in when a police officer stopped, detained, or arrested someone (HB2162). The most likely contact is during the issuance of a speeding ticket. The law does not require the officer to begin questioning a person about his immigration status or to do anything the officer would not otherwise do.
Only after a stop is made, and subsequently the officer develops reasonable suspicion on his own that an immigration law has been violated, is any obligation imposed. At that point, the officer is required to call ICE to confirm whether the person is an illegal alien.
The Arizona law is actually more restrictive than federal law. In Muehler v. Mena (2005), the Supreme Court ruled that officers did not need reasonable suspicion to justify asking a suspect about their immigration status, stating that the court has “held repeatedly that mere police questioning does not constitute a seizure” under the Fourth Amendment). Source = http://www.numbersusa.com/dfax?jid=475466&lid=9&rid=123&series=tp06MAY10&tid=999725
The major problem of illegal aliens is the prolific hiring of them by US business in direct contravention of labor law - at the expense of US labor - and these dim bastards at the AFL-CIO are all for it. What idiots!
This is what I have been saying all along. The influx of illegal immigrants depresses the cost of labor (i.e. wages) for all workers. These union jobs can easily be replaced by lower-cost immigrants.
An incredibly encouraging article. What happens if the bosses can no longer deliver the votes?
Trumka sees lots of new bodies to pay dues; union members see lots of new bodies to take their work. Being unionized will probably be the only way most newly legalized immigrants can get work. Problem is that now so few are unionized and they will probably be let go. I wonder if the newly legalized immigrants will form their own unions.