Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a very strong, very conservative ad that Meg Whitman is running. Is Meg Whitman really just Ronald Reagan in a skirt? It sure seems that way after watching her new ad campaign.
1 posted on 05/14/2010 12:31:31 PM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AlanD

Meg Whitman = John McCain. Both are liars. Damn RINOS!!


2 posted on 05/14/2010 12:33:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Wait a minute. I thought holding a firm anti-illegal-immigration position was forbidden in CA!!!!! In any case, Meg Whitman is just pandering to the conservative base. She doesn’t really mean what her ad suggests IMHO.


4 posted on 05/14/2010 12:35:48 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
video-Meg Whitman: Romney handpicked me and "I'm A Huge Fan Of Van Jones"

Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

5 posted on 05/14/2010 12:36:11 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Sadly, all the governor candidates have pretty much the same stance on illegal immigration.


7 posted on 05/14/2010 12:37:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

With Bennett’s defeat in Utah and the obvious sentiments being expressed by the Tea Party people and many others I expect we are going to see just about every “moderate” Republican (and not a few rats) suddenly lurch to the right. This is fine with me but the obvious downside is that, once elected, they simply go back to business as usual. Conservatives must give as much support as possible to the most conservative candidate but in the event that the “moderate” wins they must then stay on top of that person and hector, complain, kvetch, yell, criticize and generally make life miserable for him/her every time that person votes wrong or “crosses the aisle” in pursuit of some stupid compromise that will further weaken America. And in every election the incumbent should be confronted with opposition from the right just to demonstrate that no one is safe and that they had better damn well fight for this nation and not cave to the leftist rats who have brought it to the brink of destruction.


9 posted on 05/14/2010 12:38:39 PM PDT by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
Speaking of AZ, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 dealt with this years ago.

From this link...

Immigration and Custom Enforcement's 287(g) Program: Empowering Sheriffs to Address Illegal Immigration

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act ("IIRIRA") was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1996 and provided a broad series of amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ("INA"). Section 287(g) of IIRIRA was Congress' response to the overburdened federal immigration system. More specifically, Section 287(g) authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") to deputizes state and local law enforcement personnel so that these local officers can enforce federal immigration laws. The language of section 287(g) is written broadly, allowing ICE discretion in specifying the duties of these local officers, the duration of their authority, and ICEs supervision of these officers.

10 posted on 05/14/2010 12:38:40 PM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
"Calif. gov hopeful Whitman opposes new Arizona law"

"SACRAMENTO, Calif.—Meg Whitman, the Republican front-runner in the California gubernatorial primary, said Tuesday that Arizona is taking the wrong approach to illegal immigration with its tough new law."

snip

"Her opponent in the California GOP primary, state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, wants to end many state-funded services for illegal immigrants and their children.
He has sought to make illegal immigration a campaign issue, airing television ads in which he says California's economy is being ruined because politicians have failed to tackle the issue.

In a statement from his campaign Tuesday, Poizner reiterated his support for ending non-emergency services to illegals and revoking business licenses of companies that employ them, saying those should be the first steps taken in California."

11 posted on 05/14/2010 12:41:31 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

Meg shouldn’t be surprised if no one buys her sudden interest in the border.


12 posted on 05/14/2010 12:43:34 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

CA Gov. Race: Whitman’s Lead Collapses
BY John McCormack
May 10, 2010 5:34 PM

Less than three weeks ago, a SurveyUSA poll showed Meg Whitman leading Republican rival Steve Poizner by 22 points in the GOP gubernatorial primary. The OC Register reports that lead has dropped to two points:

Not long ago Meg Whitman had such a huge lead – 50 points – over Steve Poizner for the GOP nomination for governor, many folks thought the race was over and started sizing up her chances against the Democrats’ Jerry Brown.

When she came in to talk to our Editorial Board last week, Whitman brushed off news that some polls showed Poizner had closed the gap to about 10 points. Still 10 points isn’t anything to scoff at, especially with only a little more than a month before the polls open.

Well, this week ABC’s SurveyUSA poll shows that Poizner is now 2 points behind her – 39 percent to 37 percent.

Will Whitman be the first candidate to be defeated because of her opposition to the Arizona immigration law?

After initially expressing concerns about the immigration law, Steve Poizner gave the Arizona law his full backing. Ben Smith notes that Poizner has been hammering Whitman on the issue lately:


13 posted on 05/14/2010 12:44:59 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
This is a very strong, very conservative ad that Meg Whitman is running. Is Meg Whitman really just Ronald Reagan in a skirt? It sure seems that way after watching her new ad campaign.

You have got to be kidding.

That total nonsensical post of yours is going to lead any reader of this thread to come to the quick conclusion that you are a paid member of the Whitman staff.

Whitman is an unapologetic Abortion supporter, Reagan was adamantly Pro-life.

Whitman, as this article points out, is against the Arizona law, which Reagan would have whole-heartedly supported.

Whitman supports the TARP bailouts, Reagan would have barfed on the TARP bailouts.
14 posted on 05/14/2010 12:45:29 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
Is Meg Whitman really just Ronald Reagan in a skirt? It sure seems that way after watching her new ad campaign.

I dunno... would Ronald Reagan send thousands of dollars to democrat presidential candidates over the years? Would Ronald Reagan endorse Barbara Boxer for senate?

Good heavens open your eyes.

18 posted on 05/14/2010 12:51:52 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

>Is Meg Whitman really just Ronald Reagan in a skirt?<

Bwahahahahahaha!

Not.

More like McCain in a skirt, but thanks for playing.


20 posted on 05/14/2010 12:53:13 PM PDT by Califreak (A man is defined by the nature of his enemies-Preach it Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
As far as I could tell Ronald Reagan wasn't a pandering, bold face liar so other than running for governor, where's the comparison?
28 posted on 05/14/2010 1:01:12 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

She’s a lying sack of shit only spouting what her handlers tell her to say, mainly Pete Wilson!


44 posted on 05/14/2010 9:05:14 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD

She is a phoney! Against the Arizona law but strong on illegals? O brother...and her ad sounds retarded....like too strong in her voice..not real. I will vote for Poizner.


47 posted on 05/14/2010 9:08:26 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson