They should have followed up and asked Holder if he has ever read the Federal Immigration Law and the US Constitution.
Can you say "Prejudiced'?
the poseur “Attorney General” of the USA thinks he can talk about a law he has not even troubled to read......
WOW, just another reminder of the slovenly, dishonest, leftist incompetents who are “in charge”
but where are the ADULTS????
I would call him a prick but that is the best part of a good man. He is NOT a good man!
Reading this thread makes me thirsty for some Arizona Ice Tea!
So we have our Attorney General, our President, numerous other politicians, and the media all criticizing a law most of them haven’t bothered to read. They are basing their judgements on what groups that support open borders and illegal immigration and illegals themselves have to say about it...ok
He didn’t read the Stimulus or Obamacare either.
Bam’s tool is warped.
“Holder hasn’t read Ariz. law he criticized”
Just ONCE could one of these dumbs**ts go off FULLY COCKED?
A petition on AZ Governor Jan Brewer’s page offers you a chance to sign showing your support for her decision to sign SB1070 into law for immigration reform. She’s getting a lot of negative press over this when she should be praised.
It takes less than two minutes:
What a buffoon!
I'd give Holder the same advice I'd give his boss. If you don't know what you're talking about, keep your damn pie hole shut!
I notice how the left-wing presses have this as a page 12 story.
We live in a dark manipulative society.
Maybe he should read Mexico’s own immigration laws and learn something about how to protect your country
From website listing the laws http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/lillpop022707.htm
At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
•in the country legally;
•have the means to sustain themselves economically;
•not destined to be burdens on society;
•of economic and social benefit to society;
•of good character and have no criminal records; and
•contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
•immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
•foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
•foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
•foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
•foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
•those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Poblacion, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
The racist coward admits he’s an assclown...
Eric Holder:Another reason to do away with affirmative action hires!
What...a...dumbass.
Ping!
Un-freepin’-believable...