************************************************
The Royal Mint survey asked more than 1,136 people to identify prominent 20th century Prime Ministers, including Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair
************************************************
This article naturally begs the question of how many 16 year olds here in the USA can identify Ronald Reagan. Seeing a similar poll done here in the USA would certainly be interesting, although I'm guessing that the teachers' unions would go into hysterics and fullscale damage control mode if such questions were asked.
Some older Free Republic threads which may be of interest:
Churchill dropped from England's history syllabus (- pandering to a P.C. agenda-)
General Gordon does a Churchill (Winston's enraged grandson- 'you aren't fit to lick his boots')
Great Britain- Fury at Churchill statue (Former PM and beloved hero is in a straightjacket)
Losing the Enlightenment- Remarks at the Claremont Institute's annual Churchill Dinner (VDH)
Rumsfeld Remarks at Churchill Dinner(PATH TO VICTORY- Refashioning Institutions for 21st Century)
My children will know!
In 80 years most of those 16 year olds will no longer be recognized by anyone but their special care nurses ~ bringing them new drool cups (if they last that long).
I guess the UK education system is run by liberals, like ours, so Churchill is a non-entity because of his political stance. Also, the UK is being overrun with immigrants who do not share the same history and culture of Britain.
My family will make certain that American and Southern History survives... and they will pass it on forever.
LLS
That’s about the same as the percentage of Americans who know who their own congressman is.
US: Half of young people do not recognize Braky Obummer as a Communist...(the other half, love is blind)- & he will be deported and forgotten in less than 30 months
If he’s naked, drinking, smoking weed, cursing, having sex with his girlfriend for the week or shooting someone they will.
One of these three is not like the others
Winston Churchill is, without doubt, the greatest person of the 20th century, for his life long, fearless battle against tyranny and oppression.
Without WInston Churchill, we’d ALL be speaking German and Russian.
We may still get a chance.
Churchill in his history of WW II commented on his demise from public view in 1945 as follows:
Thus, then, on the night of the tenth of May (1940), at the outset of this mighty battle, I acquired the chief power of the State, which henceforth I wielded in ever growing measure for five years and three months of world war, at the end of which time, all our enemies having surrendered unconditionally or being about to do so, I was immediately dismissed by the British electorate from all further conduct of their affairs.
The attraction of voters for small and tedious people remains, thankfully I think, unappreciated by me.
In 80 years, the UK will not exist as an English-speaking nation, and the nation itself will be unlikely to be remembered by any of the then-current inhabitants.
Silly to worry about remembering Churchill, when England is in peril of disappearing. But France and most of the rest of Europe will suffer the same fate. Worrying about this is like worrying about whether the pigs enjoyed the half-ounce truffle that was in the five gallons of slop poured into their trough.
Ironically, the only hope I see for survival of English-speaking people in Britain is utter economic collapse, followed by the 50 years of cold weather and crop failure that is rapidly approaching. If this motivates less immigration, and even prompts some reverse migration, there is perhaps some chance for England to survive.
Here's another. See reply #27 for a link to an audio of Churchill speaking to Parliament for the first time after becoming PM.