Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fathers1
maybe this saint of a dad should have married before he decided to have sex....gee, all win/win situation.

but does this signal a change?...maybe....

it does mean that now fathers will pay no matter what...which maybe is a good thing....they will not be able to shirk their duties even if they fall out of love or find a new bimbo, they will pay for their children all the time....

so we don't need to hear anymore about how oppressive the courts are in handing out child support to the daddys....

another point....maybe next time instead of carrying the baby for 9 months mommy will simply abort........

consequences to having sexual relations before committment and marriage..

68 posted on 05/13/2010 6:58:02 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cherry
maybe this saint of a dad should have married before he decided to have sex....gee, all win/win situation. but does this signal a change?...maybe....

Read the article. The father was thrilled to be a daddy and wanted to do the right thing (raise his child). The mother and the "adoptive parents" tried to steal that from him.

If a father does not have the right to raise his child, that is, to take custody if the mother doesn't want the child, then a father should NEVER be forced to pay support for a child he doesn't want.

Either he has rights and responsibilities, or he has neither.

77 posted on 05/14/2010 8:15:33 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson