[manc]

she used her position at Harvard to advance her homosexual agenda.
she is a homsoexual activist and therefore she should not be appointed or voted in.

The question which needs to be asked is
“you banned military recruiters onto Harvard because of your belief about don’t ask, now how on earth can you after doing this be fair when a homosexual case comes before you?”

She cannot and she has shown this and therefore she should drop out right away.

She will use the courts like she did at Harvard as a position to be more of a homosexual activist than a person who follows the law

[Renderofveils]

The question which needs to be asked is...

How can you accept appointment to a judicial position (ANY of them, much less the highest in the country) when you have willfully flouted the law which required JAG officers to be allowed on campus since Harvard accepts taxpayer money, covered up for academic plagiarism on behalf of TWO Harvard law professors during your tenure as Dean of the law school, and publicly professed a love for the tenants of Socialism which are directly at odds with the Constitution you're to be defending?

Ok, maybe that's three questions.

[LaineyDee]

she is a homsoexual activist and therefore she should not be appointed or voted in.

We need steady, sober-minded and balanced individuals with REAL experience to fill our highest court. The homosexual community is rife with emotionally unbalanced individuals who rarely play "by the rules" or make consistently sound judgements... in any sector of our society. JMHO