Posted on 05/12/2010 7:03:57 PM PDT by Man50D
Internet giant Google today was hushing up the new dispute over President Obama's strange Social Security number by diverting searches for news reports on the issue to unrelated stories about Elena Kagan, oil, Tampa and the Federal Reserve.
The actual story, posted on WND.com, explained how two private investigators working independently are asking why Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
Under a Google news search for "President Obama Social Security number," the top four results all quoted, "By Jerome R. Corsi Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using aSocial Security number set aside for applicants "
Is Google 'evil'? Read the arguments in Joseph Farah's "Stop the Presses!"
However, the first link is to Politico's story about "Gay rights central to Elena Kagan fight," the second links to Politico's "Senate clears measure to audit Federal Reserve" story, the third links to a Politico story about the GOP plans for a convention in Tampa in 2012, and the last links to a Politico story about "Oil executives play pass the buck."
Google spokesman Jake Hubert told WND that it appeared to be a "bug in the snippets."
He said the company was looking into it.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Google, chrome, gmail, and facebook...they are all evil. I seriously think it is a new world order conspiracy.
No that is a SS# reserved for Kenya.
Many ss numbers of:
http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/obamas-multiple-social-security-numbers/
This article mentions 4 different ss numbers for Michelle Obama..
http://badgoneblog.com/2010/04/28/our-presidents-many-ssi-numbers/
Scroogle scraper is not working last time I checked...
WTF...does Michelle have so many SS#’s????? The Chicago Racket must be VERY very interested in SS #’s....
So how can we put their software algorithms or whatever those fancy schmancy terms are to get the story back to the top??
Works now but I hear is not that reliable.
Use Goodsearch. I use it so I can donate to the NRA Foundation.
http://www.goodsearch.com/Default.aspx
Recently I was reading some article on web past history. The author started it off with "Back in the days when AltaVista was the coolest search engine ..." or words to that effect.
I used to use them back when their hostname was still altavista.digital.com, and they used 64-bit DEC Alpha-powered servers. And they were head and shoulders above Yahoo, Lycos, WebCrawler and the rest of the pack. Then I heard about Google. Smaller index (it was still in beta at the time). Way fewer query tweaks available. Damn good results, though. You didn't really need the tweaks. It took about a week before I stopped using AltaVista.
Nowadays, all the search engines, including AltaVista, seem to use some version of Google's page-rank algorithm. So, you seem get reasonable results from most of them.
obumpa
ping for later.
Just an uneducated guess.....
Multiple acorn fannie freddy fraud?
It would be necessary to do so.
UH...were you and your wife born in the US????
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.