Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Corsi discussing this now on KHOW.
What is KNOW?
KEEP DIGGING... KEEP DIGGING.
There is so much crap surrounding this Creep-in-Chief.
DO NOT STOP !
“Your mission... should you choose to accept it”...
LLS
Boy, SS fraud would be a delicious way of catching him in a birth-origin lie, but, uh, ,,,
Social security numbers are issued at birth. The article says that system of issuing SS numbers was instituted in the 1970s. I’m younger than Obama (by a good deal), but my social security number doesn’t conform to the article’s formula at all.
Social security numbers are issued at birth - to those born in the United States. I have yet to find a record on a non-American baby born in Kenya receiving one.
Mine doesn’t match the formula either. Doesn’t mean Dear Leader’s SS isn’t fraudulent but does undermine the articles point. : (
Social Security numbers have not always been issued at birth. In the 70’s you didn’t get one until you were 16, or old enough to get your first job. That was when you got one. I got mine in 1974, when I was 16 and about to go to work. In the 70’s Obama would have done the same.
It was in the 80’s (as my children were born) that they were issued at birth.
Even then all 3 of my kids beginning 3 numbers matches the state ID.
Post #34 on this thread DOES appear accurate, and DOES jive with the story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts
I think this might take you directly there:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts#34
Not so. Social Security numbers today might be issued when a child is a baby, when I was growing up you didn't need one for anything until you went to work, and it was quite common to not get them until you were in high school. I was issued one in the State I resided in when I applied, not the State of birth.
Obama wasn't issued one until his college years I bet. And yes, like everything else about him, his is a fraud.
This post explains what the poorly written article meant, and it seems accurate, after all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts#34
All 6 members of my household match the formula.
Perhaps the formula was modified somewhere along the line.
Dangus,
You cut and pasted this exact posting in the other threads about this yesterday-—IDENTICAL.
Plus you’ve been active since, what, May 7, here at FR?
And you’ll all animated—telling us you have the single personal experience that falls outside these expert investigators due diligence.
You certainly are a busy little mole for your man...and with such flair.
Go back to your mommy’s basement Obot.
It is true that today SS numbers are issued at birth. However, when I was born in 1951, SS numbers were not issued at birth. One applied for it when seeking employment for the first time. So, 0bama’s SS number might not have been issued at his birth just like mine was not.
Same for me, but I still resided in the state where I was born. I was a teenager when I got mine. Maybe they’re issued at birth now, but that wasn’t the case 40 years ago.
Social Security numbers were not oringally issued at birth. You applied for one when when you entered the work force. I got mine at 13 due to a change in the tax law and dear old dad needed me to have one to claim me as a dependent.
The Kenyan's number is fraudalent because he's fraudalent. Why a Connecticut number I can't explain. A number from downstate New York or northern Virginia maybe if he was recruited by the Company while at Columbia. We'll have to wait for Rev. Manning to release his evidence.
They are issued at birth now - It has’t always been that way.
I don’t think mine was issued until I was 10 or 11.
Obama could have this for a SS number 666-66-6666 and the MSM would not question it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.