Skip to comments.
Mollohan Appears to be Going Down to Defeat (Trailing with 43% with 70% of precints in)
http://wdtv.com/ ^
| 05-11-2010
| WDTV
Posted on 05/11/2010 7:02:42 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Mike Oliverio 27766 56% Alan Mollohan 21660 44% --------------------------------- 49426
(Excerpt) Read more at wdtv.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; keyhouseraces; khr; mollohan; oliverio; primary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: ExTexasRedhead
I like the video. I will be glad to help them pack.
41
posted on
05/11/2010 7:37:22 PM PDT
by
mathluv
( Conservative first and foremost, republican second - GO SARAHCUDA!!!!)
To: bilhosty
already lists Mollahan as having lost on May 11. 2010. That's strange
42
posted on
05/11/2010 7:39:04 PM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
lol Sometimes it is easy to forget not everyone is following every race. Mollohan is such a crook I thought everyone knew who he was.
43
posted on
05/11/2010 7:40:01 PM PDT
by
Maelstorm
(Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
To: Maelstorm; Morgana; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Norman Bates; ExTexasRedhead; ...
It’s official, Mollohan just conceded. I think that the Tea Party movement whom Mollohan had attacked crossed over and voted in the DemocRAT primary. The victor, state Senator Mike Oliverio, is a churchgoing Catholic who ran as a conservative opponent of abortion and gun control and called for repealing ObamaCare. Normally, this isn’t a winning formula in a Democrat primary.
First Bennett, now Mollohan bites the dust. Don’t be surprised if more fall, starting with The Specter in Pennsylvania next week.
44
posted on
05/11/2010 7:43:13 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: Clintonfatigued
45
posted on
05/11/2010 7:44:02 PM PDT
by
ExTexasRedhead
(Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
The good news is it appears Republicans are very motivated. David McKinley is cruising to the nomination on the Republican side.
Thanks Maelstorm.
46
posted on
05/11/2010 7:45:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: centurion316
re: You might want to develop your search skills. A simple search of the candidates name would tell you where he is from, what district he represents, and what party he belongs to. Its really simple, and when you are done, you will be a better informed citizen. None of us can be expected to know each of the current members of Congress or to know the particulars of their individual races, but its so easy these days to become an expert. After a simple Google search on the name, go to the Cook Political report and learn about his district. Before long, you will know more than anyone in your neighborhood.)))
TOTALLY disagree with your scold. Why make someone waste their time on Google when a simple parenthetical WV CD in the headline would convey the information?
My pet peeve here are those who post info like "Murder in Greenville" only to find that it is a TV station with no state identifiers. Do a Google search on how many Greenvilles there are in the US, since you like to waste your own time.
47
posted on
05/11/2010 7:53:00 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
(Cameras, cameras--never forget to bring your cameras)
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: centurion316
You might want to develop your search skills. A simple search of the candidates name would tell you where he is from, what district he represents, and what party he belongs to. Its really simple, and when you are done, you will be a better informed citizen. Or --- the person posting the thread could simply include the most basic, and relevant details in their post to begin with, so that the hundreds of readers who open the thread have a fundamental understanding of what it's about.
Naw.....let 'em all Google it.
49
posted on
05/11/2010 7:53:49 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: ExTexasRedhead
A Tea Party supported candidate winning a Democrat primary is big, especially since he defeated a 28-year incumbent. You have told us again that something big this year will happen, and this appears to be the beginning.
50
posted on
05/11/2010 7:54:26 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: All
Very good news. Will there be any votes at all for a democrat on November 2, 2010?
To: Morgana
52
posted on
05/11/2010 7:55:46 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: FLAMING DEATH
Even if a Republican doesnt take this seat in the fall, this is a huge step in the right direction.No it isn't. When they vote to organize the House after the elections, who do you think this "conservative democrat" is going to vote for as speaker? The Republican, Boner (not a spelling mistake) or Pelousey (not a spelling mistake either)?
Just remember this, Stup(id)ak was a Pro Life democrat too.
53
posted on
05/11/2010 7:55:55 PM PDT
by
metalurgist
(Want your country back? It'll take guns and rope. Marxists won't go without a fight.)
To: Morgana
The Blue Ridge mountains and the Shenandoah River are in Virginia, not West Virginia :)
54
posted on
05/11/2010 7:56:33 PM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: Signalman
Payback’s a bitch aint it?
55
posted on
05/11/2010 7:59:25 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
He sounds preferable to many Republicans, frankly. I gather he won't be herded by the likes of Pelosi, Reid or Obama. You're being played. There were plenty of "Blue Dog Democrats" in the last Congress, and when the chips were down, they made Pelosi Speaker and passed her agenda. If this guy has a "D" behind his name, he'll vote like a 'Rat, everytime.
56
posted on
05/11/2010 8:03:34 PM PDT
by
TonyInOhio
( Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.)
To: Williams
Here’s another poll that counts. The incumbent has been in Congress since 1982.
57
posted on
05/11/2010 8:04:34 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: FLAMING DEATH; SunkenCiv; Alter Kaker; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; fieldmarshaldj; Just A Nobody; ...
Oliviero is a DINO in many ways..
Is there really such an animal as a DINO or a "blue dog" anymore in Washington? My take is that this current Pelosi-Reid Congress proves that the species is extinct.
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: centurion316
You might want to develop your search skills. A simple search of the candidates name would tell you where he is from, what district he represents, and what party he belongs to. Its really simple, and when you are done, you will be a better informed citizen.I knew exactly where this race was, after all it was on Hannity at the same time this thread came up. I was trying to make a point that a thread is pretty worthless when you have to do a Google search to figure out the meaning of a thread.
60
posted on
05/11/2010 8:06:22 PM PDT
by
w1andsodidwe
(How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson