Perish the thought!
Actually I was thinking why is Kevin James dressed in drag?
Perish the thought!
Actually I was thinking why is Kevin James dressed in drag?
Then shut up Bob. You are part of the problem.
It’s pretty bad when Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the hottest female Supreme Court Justice.
“CBS News famously posted a blog a few weeks ago which claimed, on the basis of sources at Harvard, that Elena Kagan was gay. The White House denied it and CBS apologized.”
first she was “outed”,...then she was “in-ed”
Momma’s got a squeeze box, daddy never sleeps at night...
it goes in and out, and in and out, and in and out....
Are there any cows in Texas?
What bothers me is that six justices come from Harvard and three from Yale. There are no justices from outside the Ivy League. Jews, Catholics and Ivy Leaguers... Where is the diversity of thought and philosophy?
I dont know why anybody is even asking this question. Of course not. She just has a LOT of very close girlfriends.
Me? I don’t give a rat’s ass if she is gay or not. I’ve known plenty of gays in my life and most of them don’t bother me. The only ones I’ve ever “minded” are those that are political and militant gays. Time will tell if she is one of those.
Quite honestly, I wouldn’t care if Obama’s nominee was a two-headed, striped hair dwarf...with a limp, provided this person had enough sense to read the Constitution (in its plain English that a 6th grader could read) and then rule on the merits.
If she can’t do that, NO DICE. If she can, LET’S GO.
Just as all “straights” are not in favor of things like gay marriage, not all “gays” are in favor of them, either. If you doubt me, go over to Hillbuzz.
That’s a bunch a gay Chicago former Dems, who worked for Hillary, and then for McCain/Palin. They are now Palin fans and met her in person when she was in Illinois.
They are freedom loving gay men, who hate Obama with more passion than I can even describe here, who are also very opposed to gay marriage, for example.
There are a million reasons not to confirm a radical Leftist who has written of her hope for the failure of Reaganism and the rise of "perfect socialism".
However, strong majorities have arisen who will defend what they call "sexual freedom" (slightly less strong in the case of abortion).
Opposing a nominee for her lesbianism will rally the 25% of the electorate who care, but will alienate the other 75%.
Just to lay my cards on the table, I think America is lost without mass conversion to truth, including the rejection of most varieties of "sexual freedom", but political battles are fought to win.
This issue is a loser.
All the people whop complained about Harriet Meirs for the same justifiable reason should anti-up and speak out against her on this one issue. It trumps everything else.
Forget she is a silver-spoon in the mouth elitist who grew up a in a privileged life, forget she attended Princeton University, was dean at Harvard, and was only a solicitor general for one year under BO. Forget the fact that she has pronounced herself a far left-wing radical in her writings, and opposed ROTC on campus because of “Don't ask, don't tell”. Forget the fact this witch is only 50 years old, so Obama's tentacles will be on the court for generations after he leaves office.
The woman is UNQUALIFIED. Unless a candidate has sat on the bench and has a record on their view of Constitutional issues as a adjudicator, how in the hell can they be judged???
The last go-around, with Sotomayor, we were told we needed a candidate who “looked like America.”
In Kagan, Obama has chosen an androgynous lesbian socialist who has lived her life in a Harvard bubble.
So by the Sotomayor standard, exactly how many Americans does Kagan look like?
Really? I'd be a lot LESS bothered if she hid it. I'm only a little over 30 yrs old but I hear there was a time when people USUALLY hid it and most people were grateful they did.
As for the stereotyping and profiling, nobody ever said it was a perfect system, but it's useful. Why do you think people do anything at all about their appearance? It's human nature -- and the nature of anything else with eyes -- to judge others by appearance. We expect others to "profile" us. So it's a good system; it usually gives correct results. Should we brand it unfair and forbid it because it isn't perfect?
If you come across a woman who looks like Little Annie Tranny, she just might be. And if she is, is it so much of a stretch to think she just might be a flaming leftwing welfare statist, libero-fascist, 0bamunist?
Come on, Bob Lonsberry. Quit puckering up and form some opinions like you used to.
She’s a national disgrace just like the thugs in the White House.
A better question.
Does Kagan know what is written in The Constitution?
Does Kagan care what is written in The Constitution?
If she's NOT gay, somewheres out there is a guy who lost the worst bar bet in the history of the world.