In the citations I’m seeing being put forward, the picture which emerges is highly contradictory. She appears to have both supported homosexual privileges and to have opposed them. To have supported the military and to have opposed it. To have thought the Framers did a good job in limiting governmental power and that they did an imperfect job (a la her mentor Thurgood Marshall).
I say the woman hasn’t a clue what she really thinks, nor why. I think she’s yet another mushy-headed liberal who has developed a skill at pander but no real principles or humility before truths larger than herself. And I think her deep-down preferences do not in the least positively resonate with the principles that underlay the founding of our nation.
**I say the woman hasnt a clue what she really thinks**
And neither do we. LOL!