Hawaii is the only state that can say the DNC presented a candidate that the DNC pre-certified “legally....”. The other states actually certified him BY their acceptance. The DNC document given to the other states did not say he was qualified for the office.
We all know Hawaii’s role in this farce, of course. That’s why I find it ironic that Hawaii is off the hook accepting him as a certified candidate for the ballot. Is that not a correct assessment?
That's what I thought you were referring to.
This was probably the price that had to be paid for the Hawaii government leaders to allow the fraud to go forward. It would be highly interesting for an investigative reporter with coconuts to put Nancy Pelosi on the spot for an explanation about the difference in certification forms she signed.