Whether that she/he is a lesbian or not isn’t the issue. This isn’t about her sexual proclivities, other than what that might reveal as degeneracy in her rotten soul. Just realize that the wicked man soiling the people’s Oval Office wouldn’t nominate someone he believed would not be controversial. The current affirmative action sonofabitch-in-chief is all about deepening divides in America so his commie overloards can exploit our weakening society. The woman is to be used for a weapon of division and she probably knows it and relishes the experience ... such is the mindset of degenerates in America as shown with their ‘in your face’ homosexuality.
ALL that anyone needs to know about Kagan is that....
As Dean of Harvard Law School she barred US military recruiters from the Harvard Law campus while Americans were dying at war!!!
That point needs to be hammered home relentlessly to every living American.
I believe that this is one case where detail and nuance unnecessarily complicate things with much of the public and the political/media class — pound home the point that Kagan banned military recruiters, period.
THAT is the “Achilles heel” of this nominee and of this administration.
Many people who won’t delve into the details WILL care about that and WILL be offended and appalled. People simply need to know that Obozo & co. are hard-core politically correct leftists who put their pet causes completely above US security and the men and women of the US military services.
Whether or not this specific nomination can be stopped in the Senate (unlikely) there needs to be a huge publicity campaign focused upon this single point.
We may lose this battle (over Kagan’s nomination) due to RINO Senators but *use* it to educate America about what the Obamanation really stands for.
I’d love to see Kagan’s nomination stopped, of course, but I think we need to look at it in a “tactical” way, to educate Americans and build opposition to Obozo and his clique of anti-American leftists.
plenty of info on Kagan online, at Harvard Crimson story links, etc.
First, she prohibited the Harvard Law School career services office from cooperating with the US military recruiters in any way. Then a year later she flip-flopped and reversed the ban because Harvard University was in danger of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding.
sooo, her “principled” stance is to ban the US military from recruiting at university campuses — then her flip-flop stance to to do a 180 because Harvard’s about to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding.
We focus on this and the Obamanation loses ground with the patriotic public, period.
she’s a homosexuals activist who used her position while at Harvard and for this she should step down from this nomination.
her activism is indeed very important