Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2010 4:25:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Yes it was ‘Evolution’, the God of all adnostics and athiests. How convenient!


2 posted on 05/09/2010 4:27:13 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

That evolution guy is pretty smart, eh?


3 posted on 05/09/2010 4:27:40 PM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Interesting debate.

The most intriguing question to me is: how did life begin?

I know what I believe.


4 posted on 05/09/2010 4:28:48 PM PDT by cvq3842 (Freedom is worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

As always interesting.


5 posted on 05/09/2010 4:30:59 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The author has shaky premises. To wit: to wiring which leads to a retinal blind spot “can be described as one of evolution’s “greatest mistakes””.

No. “Mistakes” die. The fit survive.

Evolution naturally selects (pun intended) those adequate, viable and superior shifts in the genome which generate a superior physical structure (i.e., a better eye) because those shifts/mutations (call them what you will) permit more individuals with that altered genome to live, thrive and reproduce.

Just as the Creator envisioned.


6 posted on 05/09/2010 4:33:29 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Wiring on the outside ~ ? That’s a touch screen!


10 posted on 05/09/2010 4:51:22 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not only did “evolution” come up with the most ingenious idea of a lens focusing by changing its shape rather than moving it along the focal plane as in cameras, this amazing inventor “evolution” also wired it perfectly to the most complex computer know to man, the brain, to process an immense quantity of visual information at an astonishing speed. All this of course happened by trial and error and “natural selection”.

These moron scientists will never admit that some things are beyond their ability to understand.


11 posted on 05/09/2010 4:53:56 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

With respect to complexity the eye is nothing compared to the DNA molecule, and nothing to date can explain its existence short of Divine Intervention. Oh wait, I forgot, Aliens put it here.


13 posted on 05/09/2010 4:56:17 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (END THE WAR ON LIBERTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

So, before the eye was “evolving” everything was stumbling around, blind? And isn’t amazing that the eyes “evolved” differently with each animal/creature that needed to see.
That Evolution is one smart cookie, that’s for sure.


20 posted on 05/09/2010 5:14:42 PM PDT by irishtenor (Tag line is on vacation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Sex invented itself so it could find another different sex outside itself and make another thing that also do the same thing ad infinitum.

Lust also invented itself to accompany sex so it wouldn`t be lonely.

As The Great Evolutionist Tina Turner once stated:

"What`s Love Got to do With It?"

oops Forgot- Love invented itself, too.

22 posted on 05/09/2010 5:24:11 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I wonder if God is aware of this. If God were human instead of Who He is, I wouldn't be within a country mile of this guy or any of his friends, the ACLU, H'wood left, or Obama Admin. I would be afraid of raining thunderbolts and lightening.

We are praying for this nation, and lately, I have been praying God would speak to these people in a manner they can understand--"Please, Lord, take 'em down."

vaudine

23 posted on 05/09/2010 5:25:27 PM PDT by vaudine (,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Is the inverted retina a mistake?
30 posted on 05/09/2010 6:09:58 PM PDT by LiteKeeper ("It's the peoples' seat!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Sure, sending light through Müller cells enhances vision, but that is not an argument for [choosing/evolution] to put the wiring in front of the sensors.

Silly argument, whatever position one takes on creation vs. evolution, unless one happens to be a True Believer in [whichever]. Right along with:

Of course, findings that coincide with the claims of [the other side] do not mean they have a point

"Well of course not. Because we're right and they aren't."

31 posted on 05/09/2010 6:13:45 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I was watching a show about river fishing for "monster" fish. One fish they caught was a giant stingray. After pulling it in it gave birth to its live offspring. They mentioned the fact that the baby stingrays have little covers on their stingers while inside the mom. Within 3 to 5 minutes after coming out the little cover rots and falls off.

THAT is amazing. An amazing design. By an amazing God.

34 posted on 05/09/2010 6:45:36 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Tracing the gradual development of the stupendously complex eye of the trilobite through its evolutionary predecessors is tremendously fascinating.


38 posted on 05/09/2010 6:58:34 PM PDT by Elsiejay (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I have changed my thinking about evolution over the the past year from reading books by scientists such as Francis Collins, Karl Giberson, and Alister McGrath. All of whom are devout Christians and scientists that support Darwin's views on natural selection. They all have different reasons for their faith, and Giberson is far too theologically liberal for me, but they believe that God is the source of all truth. Collins’ work on the human genome project in which he makes a case that all life evolved from a single species is hard to refute. I fully understand the struggles involved in accepting the idea that Darwin and Christianity are compatible, and I am still wrestling with idea.
39 posted on 05/09/2010 6:58:51 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Are we to believe that God would behave the way that people who don’t believe in Him say He would? That’s just silly.


41 posted on 05/09/2010 7:10:04 PM PDT by conservative_crusader (The voice of truth, tells me a different story. The voice of truth says do not be afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

These scientists. They should go back and read Chapter 6 of On the Origin of Species by Darwin, entitled “Limitations of Theory.” He states right there that the complexities of the eye are enough to break the theory of evolution. But, I’m sure some evo will pounce all over me (like they always do) claiming Darwin didn’t mean what he said. Whatever.


47 posted on 05/09/2010 7:26:01 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer ("It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

One fine day believers will never again be vexed by these antichrist people claiming to tell us how the universe was really made. They will be in torment and we will be with the God who made everything!


48 posted on 05/09/2010 7:32:32 PM PDT by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The most amazing thing of all is - without a sensing ability to interpret light waves, there is nothing to see. And without a sensing ability to interpret sound waves, there is nothing to hear.

In a bizarre twist, we are not there to see OR hear. Only by curiously developed functions do we have presence.

Which begs the question...

...do we really exist?


51 posted on 05/09/2010 7:57:50 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson