Posted on 05/09/2010 2:20:02 PM PDT by george76
How about one for the enemies within???
Hey, Holder - how about you not be in such a hurry to read foreign terrorism suspects their rights? It’s like Holder is saying ‘Stop me before I Mirandize again...’
Foreign terrorists waging war against America have no rights. Constitutional or otherwise.
To start with, prior to reading Miranda, the terrorist must be provided a chaise lounge, and seated comfortably. Then, offered a drink of his/her choice (devout muslims may prefer a soft drink to alchoholic.... especially if its a hot day). Pillows should be made available. Then and only then, the Miranda can be read to the terrorist...
Well, Holder, you stupid jerk. We don’t need any new congressional “understanding.” We need to obey the laws we already have. An Attorney General ought to understand that.
Unfortunately, you are a corrupt, racist, communist AG, so it’s probably hard for you to wrap your head around such concepts as law and order and constitutional government.
No Miranda rights for foreign combatants and terrorists, you jerk.
Congress told you not to Mirandize terrorists in the first place, Idiot Holder!!
Too much studying going on, we need more - let’s get it done before people get killed.
Seems to me we need a legal definition of what constitutes terrorism and terrorists.
Hang terrorists and leave us American Citizens and our God given rights alone.
Let it go.
this idiot is finally agreeing with everything Bush said was necessary.
If you have physical evidence, or witnesses, as there was in the case of the underwear bomber, you don't need a confession or the terrorist's information in court. Hence not Mirandizing him doesn't affect the ability to prosecute him. The information obtained from him before letting him lawyer up is intended to allow you to go after other terrorists. It isn't intended to be used for prosecuting him.
In the case of the Times Square bomber, I believe there was sufficient physical evidence to tie him to the crime. No matter what he said in advance of being Mirandized, none of it matters for his prosecution.
The proper consideration is, do we have enough evidence to convict without questioning the suspect? If so, get it locked down so there's no question that it came from a tainted source (non-Mirandized), the question the hell out of him about other terrorists. When he's been pumped dry, Mirandize him, get him a lawyer, and take him to court (or better yet, a military tribunal).
"Quiet!! You have no rights here except those granted by the US after you have been questioned."
vaudine
. . . possible limitations of the constitutional rights afforded terrorism suspects — [even for American citizens].
Holder must end his sentence after the word “suspects”.
Anything more and all of our Constitutional rights (of which foreign terrorists have none) are in jeopardy.
Hussein and Holder are POSING for the 2010 elections.
No one in their right mind believes these two jerkwads give a s&*^ about getting rid of terrorists.
Gimme a break, clowns. You’re about as believable as Bill Clinton.
They are the ones in charge.
“You have the right to an Imam. If you do not have an Imam, one will be appointed for you, whether you want one or not.”
Given that Tea Party Members are lumped in with “terrorists” according to this bunch, I would be very suspicious of such a suggestion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.