OK, if so, I would welcome more insight on his analysis...
Chirp... chirp...
Since I have not seen a response from you as to why you claim Polarik's analysis is flawed, then by your lack of response, you give the appearance that you are even less credible than you claim Polarik is.
In any case, thanks for the clarification.
Just the fact that he did the analysis of a digital image published on the internet is proof enough to anyone who understands the process.