Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC

Bad time to be basing one’s opinions on endorsements for you Sybilistas.


35 posted on 05/07/2010 3:38:25 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

-—”Bad time to be basing one’s opinions on endorsements for you Sybilistas.”—

Tit-for-tat as you supporters of one-percenters continue to exercise an inexcusible indifference toward whether or not the nominee in a given race is a 5% Conservative or an 85% Conservative. DeVore is toast, and Sarah is doing what you haters REFUSE to do, and that’s work to defeat the most Liberal candidate in favor of an acceptably Conservative one.

Endorsements either hurt, or they don’t. You Sarah haters never, ever can live by the same litmus tests you create - you always try and have it both ways (Palin endorses McCain = EVIL and UNFORGIVABLE, Hunter/DeMint endorse RINOs = instantly forgiven!).

DeVore had EVERY chance in the world to present himself as the alternative to Campbell, and has failed to gain any traction. His candidacy can ONLY serve ONE purpose right now, and that is to GUARANTEE that a RINO wins the nomination over an acceptable, though not perfect, Conservative candidate.

The fight right now is between an OPENLY Liberal Republican candidate and an acceptably Conservative candidate (Campbell vs. Fiorina). Had DeVore shown ANY life, I suspect Palin would have endorsed him as the alternative to Campbell, but he has not shown any such life. It’s over, we need to unite to STOP THE OPENLY LIBERAL CANDIDATE.

Palin is right to use her weight to stop RINO Campbell. In this case, that required waiting to see which Conservative alternative had the best chance to beat Campbell. When it proved to be Fiorina, she jumped into the fold on her behalf.

DeVore CANNOT WIN THIS NOMINATION anymore than what’s-his-face can win over Rand Paul and Trey Grayson in Kentucky. Stop bitching about Palin endorsing Conservative candidates who can WIN and defeat RINOs instead of endorsing somewhat more Conservative candidates who poll at Ralph Nader-like numbers. The end result will be a candidate better than the RINO running, and it is NOT preferable to GO DOWN WITH THE SHIP AND NOMINATE A LIBERAL by bleeding super-Conservative votes off from Conservative votes.

Fiorina is ACCEPTABLY Conservative and can win. DeVore can only serve to SINGLE_HANDEDLY hand Campbell the nomination and guarantee, and be PERSONALLY responsible for, another RINO in a General Election race.

Stop bitching that Palin isn’t endorsing your one-percenter and being as indifferent as you as the whether a 5% Conservative or an 85% Conservative wins the nod. Yes, your one-percenter might be 90% Conservative, and that’s better than 85% Conservative; but your one-percenter can’t win, and giving the 5% Conservative the nod in the name of “principle” is cutting-off your nose to spite your face.

This is NOT DeVore vs. two Liberals, it is an acceptably Conservative candidate and more Conservative candidate vs. a Liberal. VOTE AGAINST THE LIBERAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


40 posted on 05/07/2010 3:46:49 PM PDT by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson