Interestingly enough, I think I do. Which is exactly why it should get all the play time it needs: letting these people expose themselves is the best weapon we have. You can't be mis-construed as a racist when the true, violent racists are putting the label on themselves.
And agreeing Tancredo - that the film shouldn't be distributed - aligns you with censoring Nazis. <---See how I did the same stupid thing you did, there?
You are one dim bulb aren’t you.
I’ll bet you also believe that Roger Moore destroyed himself in the eyes of the citizens of this nation. I’m sure that $100 million box office and Oscar convinced you that the citizens of this nation recognize evil when they see it.
So what’s you smart ass answer going to be, when some of our politicians are assassinated?
Our youth have tatoos and piercings all over them. Why? Because that was shown in the popular media. When movies depicted young men pulling off the tops of women as a lark, within one year young men were being arrested in Palm Springs for doing the same thing.
Sure, some people will get it. And a number of people will buy into the movie. We have tens of thousands of those people marching through our street here in Southern California, and I don’t want this to catch on.
So no, I’m not buying your support of incitement as a brilliant teaching tool. If it teaches even one malcontent to kill, while teaching one million others what is really up, I’m still not buying into it.