Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BikerJoe

“Some ISPs WERE thinking about somehow favoring access to their “portal” site and inhibiting access to other portal sites...”

Do you mean like old time AOL? Before what we know now as “internet” there were providers that let you dial in to their servers, and then you had access to their content, and getting out to other networks was kind of “second rate” access. That didn’t stick. Competition gave direct access to “the net” (not “a portal”) and AOL eventually switched to what we know now.


100 posted on 05/06/2010 1:57:46 PM PDT by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Moose Burger
“Some ISPs WERE thinking about somehow favoring access to their “portal” site and inhibiting access to other portal sites...” Do you mean like old time AOL? Before what we know now as “internet” there were providers that let you dial in to their servers, and then you had access to their content, and getting out to other networks was kind of “second rate” access. That didn’t stick. Competition gave direct access to “the net” (not “a portal”) and AOL eventually switched to what we know now.

Yes, AOL is the prime example, but two modern-day examples are MSN and Yahoo, except they aren't also ISPs.
101 posted on 05/06/2010 4:50:44 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson