Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC to Overhaul Regulation of Internet Lines
The Wall Street Journal ^ | May 5, 2010 | Amy Schatz

Posted on 05/05/2010 2:04:02 PM PDT by abb

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski has decided to reregulate Internet lines to protect net neutrality, siding with consumer groups and Internet companies worried that Internet providers have too much power.

On Wednesday, Mr. Genachowski's staff began briefing the FCC's commissioners on how they will propose to regulate Internet lines under rules that were written for traditional phone networks. Some of those rules won't be applied to Internet networks, FCC officials say, but others will be used to enforce net neutrality, or regulations that require Internet providers to treat traffic equally and not slow or block websites.

Phone and cable companies opposed the FCC reclassifying regulation of Internet lines under Title 2 of the Communications Act, which was written for traditional phone networks and includes provisions such as rate regulations.

snip

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; censorship; dbm; fcc; internet; lping; netneutrality; papersplease; powergrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: Moose Burger
“Some ISPs WERE thinking about somehow favoring access to their “portal” site and inhibiting access to other portal sites...” Do you mean like old time AOL? Before what we know now as “internet” there were providers that let you dial in to their servers, and then you had access to their content, and getting out to other networks was kind of “second rate” access. That didn’t stick. Competition gave direct access to “the net” (not “a portal”) and AOL eventually switched to what we know now.

Yes, AOL is the prime example, but two modern-day examples are MSN and Yahoo, except they aren't also ISPs.
101 posted on 05/06/2010 4:50:44 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: abb

I’ll be so glad when the Obozo Regime is dead and buried!


102 posted on 05/06/2010 5:48:06 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

They have always invested under those rules why would they stop now? They are going to piss away billions of dollars because they can’t divert bandwidth to who they want?

You guys will really be whining when your liberal cable company puts bandwidth to a conservative website limited to only one person at a time.

Does anyone not think anything through anymore?


103 posted on 05/06/2010 9:31:46 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson