With over 11,720 posts in 11.5 years, I’m running about 1000 posts each year - and you had to go back two years to find a thread I posted on? Does the phrase “Get a life!” convey anything?
Nor was it an eligibility thread. It was about where Obama’s mother was in the time after his birth. My comments were based on an article published in a paper, and did not address Obama’s eligibility.
Here are the articles:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004334057_obama08m.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004164387_brodeur05m.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1729524-3,00.html
Nothing I posted was on Barry’s eligibility.
Red & jeremiah,
Y’all want to understand Mr Rogers’ motive? His is not unlike mine. We believe the birther narrative, especially the perpetuation of demonstrably false Internet rumors, damages the credibility of FR by making all of us look like insane, conspiracy theorists and racist hate mongers.
It’s perfectly acceptable to believe that Obama was ineligible to the office. I believe that. It’s perfectly acceptable to argue that position from a logical and well-thought out perspective. I do that.
What isn’t acceptable is turning on fellow freepers and conservatives simply because you disagree on one issue. Many of the freepers on the Sanity Squad have been freepers since ‘97 and ‘98 - longer than most birthers. To call them trolls, Obots, and paid DOJ bloggers and question their patriotism and/or faith is unconscionable.
Drew68’s son is seven months old. His wife probably carried her son for nine months. That’s 16 months total. You believe his sole motivation is the natural born citizenship of his son, right? The eligibility threads began during the early summer of 2008. Drew’s wife probably became with child sometime in December 2008. Did you verify that Drew68 didn’t start posting on these threads until after he found out his wife was with child? Probably not. Y’all didn’t bother checking my posting history before you started launching accusations at me.
To attack another freeper’s motivations without credible evidence proves that your arguments aren’t strong enough to allow any debate. Just like liberals, you belittle those who might shine a light on the flaws in your arguments. You should welcome the opportunity to prove your case.
An Orly Taitz's thread about Obama's past origins to include his mother whereabouts at the time of his birth is an eligibility thread.
With over 11,720 posts in 11.5 years, I’m running about 1000 posts each year - and you had to go back two years to find a thread I posted on? Does the phrase “Get a life!” convey anything?
So what how many times you've posted. I have over 25,000 posts. I can find posts on FR threads in a very quick manner, which in other words, it doesn't take me a life time to do so.
Nothing I posted was on Barry’s eligibility.
Gee Rogers, since I have "no life" you shouldn't throw more stones when I can search for yours posts on long ago eligibility threads. Here you are again in October of 2008:
[WND] DNC steps in to silence lawsuit over Obama birth certificate