Replies

Here is what you said,

"... the states, the Congress and the Supreme Court cannot disqualify Obama after the fact."

If Obama was "disqualified" he would be removed.

Again, here is what YOU said and is contradictory to your statement above.

"If Obama was born overseas, I support his IMMEDIATE removal."

To "REMOVE" Obama after the "FACT," he would have to be "DISQUALIFIED" as an usurper 'president'.

However, a fact deliberately lied about and concealed - which is what it would be IF Obama was born in Kenya - WOULD disqualify him, and I think Congress would agree to remove him.

Now you admit to one of your contradictions in your post above that Congress can remove him after the 'fact.' Obama could also be removed if he never qualified for office. The Supreme Court could make him a figurehead with no power; a joker in the White House if they found Obama to be unconstitutional as president -- as no one would have to legally follow his orders. Obama could sit in the White House without any legitimate authority...keeping the lights on or something.

Ah...so you know they are birthers even if they do NOT believe that Obama’s father’s citizenship disqualifies Obama - and you know it based on secrets they’ve kept to themselves.

Rush and Hayward have questioned Obama's legitimacy like how about seeing Obama's real birth certificate? On his genuine birth certificate, if Obama has one, it would show if Obama was born in Hawaii [Jus soli] and to whom was his parents [ Jus sanguinis ], and if Obama showed it in a court of law, it would become public record. Obama would be exposed and vulnerable to one or both issues - Jus soli and Jus sanguinis.

If you had the brains God gave a goose, you would see no contradiction. I said a fact known to all prior to the election - Obama’s father - could not disqualify him after the election.

If I had the brains of a goose, you would wish for my goose brain since your brain is equivalent to what lives in goose droppings.

You cut out part of what I said in a deceptive attempt to make your case. I said ““My argument, as you well know, is that a fact known to the voters, Rush Limbaugh, JD Hayworth, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin, his opponents, the states, the Congress and the Supreme Court cannot disqualify Obama after the fact.”

The fact referenced was the citizenship of Obama’s father. That was known before he began his run.

HOWEVER, if he concealed a foreign birth, which everyone admits would disqualify him, then all bets are off. He then became President under false pretenses, and Congress should (and I believe would) remove him from office.

It is wrong to cut & paste to pretend your opponent said something different. That is lying.

“Rush and Hayward have questioned Obama’s legitimacy like how about seeing Obama’s real birth certificate?”

And that is different that what I said that they rejected - that Obama is not the legitimate President because of his father’s citizenship.

Here is the exact quote:

“If you have evidence that JD Hayworth believes Obama is disqualified from being President because of his father’s citizenship, please post it.

If you believe Rush Limbaugh thinks Obama is disqualified from being President because of his father’s citizenship, post it.”

You haven’t. Nor can you, because neither has ever said that Obama is not qualified to be President because of his father’s citizenship. Neither has Sarah Palin, nor any member of Congress or state official or court.

You need to stop lying about what I have said. It is a matter of record, and lying makes you look like you don’t have the brains God gave a goose.