You cut out part of what I said in a deceptive attempt to make your case. I said ““My argument, as you well know, is that a fact known to the voters, Rush Limbaugh, JD Hayworth, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin, his opponents, the states, the Congress and the Supreme Court cannot disqualify Obama after the fact.”
The fact referenced was the citizenship of Obama’s father. That was known before he began his run.
HOWEVER, if he concealed a foreign birth, which everyone admits would disqualify him, then all bets are off. He then became President under false pretenses, and Congress should (and I believe would) remove him from office.
It is wrong to cut & paste to pretend your opponent said something different. That is lying.
“Rush and Hayward have questioned Obama’s legitimacy like how about seeing Obama’s real birth certificate?”
And that is different that what I said that they rejected - that Obama is not the legitimate President because of his father’s citizenship.
Here is the exact quote:
“If you have evidence that JD Hayworth believes Obama is disqualified from being President because of his father’s citizenship, please post it.
If you believe Rush Limbaugh thinks Obama is disqualified from being President because of his father’s citizenship, post it.”
You haven’t. Nor can you, because neither has ever said that Obama is not qualified to be President because of his father’s citizenship. Neither has Sarah Palin, nor any member of Congress or state official or court.
You need to stop lying about what I have said. It is a matter of record, and lying makes you look like you don’t have the brains God gave a goose.
You cut out part of what I said in a deceptive attempt to make your case.
No it was not deceptive. I only shortened your statement to make it easier for you to understand. I said the same thing in the previous post to you with all your words intact. And anyone could look up the thread and see what you wrote in that your post.
The fact referenced was the citizenship of Obama’s father. That was known before he began his run.
To quote the esteemed Supreme Court Justice Thomas, "We are evading the issue." Yes, not only has the Supreme Court evaded the eligibility issue so has the other courts
his opponents, the states, the Congress and the Supreme Court cannot disqualify Obama after the fact.”
And again, as I pointed out to you Congress or Supreme Court can "disqualify" Obama after the "fact." I did not say talking heads on radio and tv could disqualify Obama from office.
“Rush and Hayward have questioned Obama’s legitimacy like how about seeing Obama’s real birth certificate?”
The questioned was answered satisfactory above. They have questioned Obama legitimacy, which could include them questioning about the jus sanguinis issue. Because they have not elucidated it to you does not mean they don't think it is not legitimate question.
You haven’t. Nor can you, because neither has ever said that Obama is not qualified to be President because of his father’s citizenship. Neither has Sarah Palin, nor any member of Congress or state official or court.
I never said they did and I have explain to you why. The reason are numerous mostly because of the overwhelming liberal press ridicule they would receive if the did. Alinsky rule number 1 is it? How about Obama show his real birth certificate in a court of law? So what sorry excuse can you make for Obama?
You need to stop lying about what I have said. It is a matter of record, and lying makes you look like you don’t have the brains God gave a goose.
I don't have lie and I am not lying, and you are acting like the village idiot here. I've explained things to you that you will not acknowledge or you refuse to understand.