Daily Kos Article Says Number of Abortions is "Too Low," Doesn't Want Them Rare

Life News ^ | 4/30/10 | Sarah Knoploh

[wagglebee]

Even though 1.21 million abortions were performed in 2005, this was not enough for Thorne-Thomsen. She wrote, “On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low.”

Too low? That's a murdered baby EVERY 24 SECONDS you heartless bitch.

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[johniegrad]

Obamacare will dramatically increase the number of abortions.

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[pnh102]

They should lead by example and commit suicide. Heck, if they want unlimited abortions, then having them far removed from birth should be just fine.

[metmom]

She never explained how many abortions a year would be enough for the Pro-Choice Public Education Project, but continued to write, “We say we care about women and want them to have access to all the information, services and resources necessary to make the best decisions they can for themselves and their families. That is at the core of reproductive justice. Not reducing the number of abortions.”

Likely when there are NO live births, she'll consider the number just about right.

I feel sick.

God's going to have to forgive me for wishing that she'd feel the pain for eternity that every baby who was ever aborted was forced to endure.

[metmom]

Heck, if they want unlimited abortions, then having them far removed from birth should be just fine.

They're working on that....

For us.

[mainsail that]

“On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low.”

So do them for free. Provide a free ride too..

[I_Like_Spam]

Obamacare will dramatically increase the number of abortions.
____________________________

I’m not sure if you’re correct on this.

But Obamacare will definitely dramatically increase the amount of money spent on abortion in America.

Right now, many abortion mill patrons don’t have medical insurance coverage for abortion and pay cash money. Once insurance companies and the government begin paying for it, the revenues will definitely pick up to catch up with the rest of the medical field.

[chesley]

I’m betting that they’re thinking of all the criminals that won’t be born. :wink: :wink:

[wagglebee]

They are actually murdering 3500 potential liberal voters EACH DAY.

[Proud_USA_Republican]

Sheeesh. Frickin grim reaper. What a thing to be disappointed about.

[Allegra]

“We say we care about women and want them to have access to all the information, services and resources necessary to make the best decisions they can for themselves and their families. That is at the core of reproductive justice. Not reducing the number of abortions.”

What a sick, twisted, bitter woman Thorne_Thomsen is.

[LukeL]

Many in the pro-choice movement are for popualtion control. Marget Sanger created Planned Parenthood for that reason. At least some groups see abortion for what it is. It is genocide against the poor, handicappe and minorities.

[GloriaJane]

[Maelstorm]

Can’t credit liberals for very many smart analogies. I’d love to see them try to sell that tired old feminist liberation garbage today.

[wombtotomb]

The author makes reference to abortion being like setting a fireman on fire before rushing into a building, a soldier being shot before being issued a firearm, and a man having to view his vans deferens before getting a vasectomy.

This is a ridiculous analogy and completely wrong. It would be more fair to compare a fireman watching his child be set on fire, or his child being shot. It has always been a puzzlement to me when pro aborts go nuts about the ultrasound thing. If a woman wants an abortion, an ultrasound will NOT change her mind, UNLESS she had been convinced by someone that the baby she is carrying is a clump of cells, not a life. Abortions will NOT be reduced by this law unless most women don’t know they are carrying a baby in the first place, IMHO, and therefore, ultrasounds won’t deter them from their choice. That said, if they have been lied to about development of a baby in the womb, and this window in shows that, then there will be a dramatic drop in the number of abortions because of this law. Just what exactly are the pro aborts worried about? Perhaps misleading those women coming in to PP about abortion? Seems silly to me to be so off their rockers. They are the ones who always talk about learning, education, enlightenment, and all that. You would think educating a woman about this stuff would be a natural for those who consider themselves so progressive and enlightened, no?

[liberalism is suicide]

Interesting that in the photo accompanying the article that a clenched fist—a communist symbol—is featured on the yellow protest banner.

[shibumi]

Can there be any doubt that the real goal all along was not just the lives of the innocents, but harvesting the souls of those poor misguided women who aborted them?

You might as well hold a Black Mass and use the Blood of the Innocents as communion wine.