Posted on 04/29/2010 5:18:25 PM PDT by MamaDearest
Court Precedent Contradicts Obama Administration Position Justice Department Lawyers Claim Previous Court Cases “Incorrectly Decided” Contact Information: 202-646-5172 ext. 305
Washington, DC Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the Obama Justice Department advanced the erroneous claim in an April 21, 2010, court filing that Secret Service’s logs of White House visitors are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). As Judicial Watch noted in its original complaint filed on December 7, 2009, this claim “has been litigated and rejected repeatedly” by the courts.
The Justice Department filing comes in Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit seeking records for all visitors to the White House from January 20, 2009, to the present. On February 22, 2010, Judicial Watch filed a “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment” in its lawsuit, noting that the rule of law and court precedent do not support the position of the Obama administration: "At issue here is whether Secret Service visitor logs are agency records subject to the Freedom of Information Act ('FOIA'), 5 U.S.C. § 552. To date, every court that has reached this issue has concluded that the requested documents are agency records and must be processed in response to a properly submitted FOIA request. As no disputes of material fact exist as to the nature of the records, summary judgment as to this straightforward legal issue should be entered now."
Noting court precedent, Judicial Watch argued in its motion that the visitor logs were "created by" the U.S. Secret Service and that they remain "under agency control." Judicial Watch also noted that the U.S. Secret Service had released the visitor logs in response to previous FOIA requests from Judicial Watch and other parties, further demonstrating that these records are under the control of the U.S. Secret Service and subject to FOIA.
However, Obama Justice Department lawyers countered in their court filing that “the district court cases on which [Judicial Watch] relies for a contrary conclusion were incorrectly decided,” and stuck by their argument that the visitor logs “are not agency (Secret Service) records subject to FOIA.” Justice Department lawyers also repeated the blanket argument that to release these records could compromise national security and praised the Obama administration’s efforts to “voluntarily” release some White House visitor logs to the public. (In 2009, the Obama White House began to release, in order to settle related litigation, a select number of Secret Service visitor logs to the public. However, tens of thousands of other records continue to be withheld in defiance of FOIA law.) The Obama White House admits in the new court filing that it is taking records from the Secret Service in order to ensure that they are not disclosed under FOIA. The Obama administration speculates that there would be “dire national security consequences” if certain White House visitors are disclosed. The Obama White House wants to be able to withhold visitor logs until as long as 12 years after President Obama leaves office.
On October 27, at the request of the White House, Judicial Watch staff visited with senior White House officials led by Norm Eisen, Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government, to discuss Judicial Watch's pursuit of the visitor logs. During the meeting, White House officials offered to make some accommodations to Judicial Watch on the visitor logs and encouraged Judicial Watch to publicly praise the Obama administration's commitment to transparency. However, the White House refused to abandon its legally indefensible contention that the visitor logs are not subject to FOIA law, prompting Judicial Watch's lawsuit. "The Obama administration would undermine a key transparency law in order to keep White House visitor logs secret,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Only the Obama administration could offer to release pre-scrubbed White House visitor logs while withholding tens of thousands of other records and call it transparency. President Obama has violated his campaign promises of openness and transparency. We hope the court will do what it has done on previous occasions and uphold FOIA law.” Bookmark/Search this post with:
Like those 12 year old little boy’s
The most transparent and open administration ever............
Is he fearful citizens will be outraged by his choice of guests, OR is he threatening "consequences" if he doesn't get a total transparency blackout (like just about every other personal bit of information about him)?
And they get away with it.
And it must be nice to have the news media help with the hiding as well. Nixon, Reagan & Bush should’ve been so lucky.
Wonder what the going price is for the Lincoln Bedroom these days?
The freak is hosting bin laden in the Lincoln bedroom??
Very distressing. Believe it or not, I read a SALON article today lamenting the fact that reporters were afraid to ask any hard questions of the White House (they can’t ask Barry himself, because he hasn’t had a press conference for ages).
When are people going to wake up and see what is happening to our country and our system under this evil creature?
Did you see this thread related to your comment?
Is the press (print press) coming out of its coma?
Why Reporters Are Down On President Obama
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2502346/posts
IMHO the heartland of America is wide awake and feeling as if they're on a rollercoaster that's leaving the tracks, paralyzed with fear and grave concern as to why politicians (both pubbies and dems) didn't fully vet this man and how our nation (and us) will survive whatever potential damage he's going to do beyond what he's already done.
who’s he trying to hide? GOLDMAN SACHS maybe??????
Can you imagine the bruhaha THAT would cause? Methinks he has skeletons to hide besides his own personal past.
Ummm.
To: MamaDearest
“there would be ‘dire national security consequences’ if certain White House visitors are disclosed.”
So osama bin laden has been secretly visiting the white tent?
1,707 posted on Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:38:37 PM by MestaMachine (Gubmintfood. Somewhere in the world, a ‘rat is starvin’)
Time will tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.