Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius

I’m finding that Hamilton gets right up my nose.

No wonder he was in a duel..


318 posted on 04/28/2010 8:37:34 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Liberals are educated above their level of intelligence.. Thanks Sr. Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: TASMANIANRED
No wonder he was in a duel.

Hamilton was dangerous when he had too much to drink. When in his cups, he tended to be loquacious and didn't watch his tongue.

At a dinner party in New York, Hamilton said someting about Burr that was eventually relayed to him, and Burr felt he had no choice but to challenge Hamilton to a duel. The exact content of Hamilton's allegation was a mystery.

In his book Burr, published in 1973, Gore Vidal said that Hamilton had alluded in a stage whisper that Burr was carrying on an incestuous affair with his daughter, which was enough to trigger Burr's fury. Historians of the time charged Vidal with being salacious, but more recent scholarship indicates that Vidal may have gotten it right.

In this case, it was not "In vino, veritas", but "In vino, mortuus."

336 posted on 04/28/2010 8:45:50 PM PDT by Publius (Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson