Replies

Let me clarify LibertyRocks--two separate emails from two different peoiple reinterating the basic fact of someone with standing has been found. It was my impression that the emails were from political sources east of Arizona and my thinking was the east coast. I can not remember now, why I had that impression, but I had it at the time. Hillary did not figure into the conversation and is not the source as far as I know.

I think some folks might be reading too much into the word "source" and it is my fault for using that word. Lets just say it was my interpretation that he obviously has political friends after being in the field for decades. I imagine that they were speaking with candor and maybe a certain insight. Two different people wrote him within a few days of this fact that someone with standing has entered the court system and we will hear more about this particular case in a month and that it will be strong enough to go to the USSC because there is someone with standing.

I hope that clears things up a bit. I don't want folks here to go off full of glee and cooking up scenarios that may not be the case. AND I have to say once again, take the information for what its worth.... It could be a bunch of hooey. I only repeat it, because I found the issue of standing interesting and am wondering which case is currently proceeding.

I don't know if it is a brand new case, or one that has been in the system. I wanted to know, but was unable to get that information from the gentleman.

Oh, I completely understood what you said. Like I said, it’s all speculation or conjecture. I didn’t mean to imply that I thought Hillary was the source (or that that is what you implied even). Just that this may be the person of “standing” — because above all other candidates she is the one directly harmed by Obama’s fraud as she lost the nomination to him (and also as a result of what her supporters thought was fraud on the part of the DNC).

And Fitzgerald no doubt has the “goods” regarding Obama - from a variety of angles. Keep in mind that Fitzgerald has been investigating the allegations against ACORN in Chicago for several years already (which is why, because the rumor coincided with the FBI raiding ACORN, that people thought the investigation was about ACORN).

As I stated, this could have NOTHING to do with the conversation you had with the political consultant. It’s just something that popped into my head after reading your post... I’ve been trying to figure out exactly what’s up there in Chicago with the Blago trial, but it’s not as if Fitzgerald’s office isn’t involved in other investigations and cases. If there is one US Attorney out there that is not afraid to step in the middle of a big pile of political manure, it would have to be Fitzgerald...

As far as getting all excited — I mean yeah, of course if it turns out to be a correct guess, THEN I’ll get a little excited. However, we’ve been through so much of this over the last 2 1/2 years that I’m not worried about people taking my post as anything more than mere speculation... :) I wouldn’t worry about anyone taking your post for more than it’s worth either — as you said a few times; for all you know it could be true, or it could be smoke and mirrors.

Sorry to worry you with my speculations! :)