Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertyRocks; MWestMom

“Just one of many, many possibilities. The rumors put out by HillBuzz back in Oct. 2008 may have had EVERYTHING to do with the Blago trial.”


Just for the discussion is there any hints on what ground, except for having standing, that person could file charges?

Was Blago even investigated yet Oct/2008??

Harlem, N.Y. is an Eastern State and it is less than 30 days also???

There is NOT much difference in Hillary’s political philosophy vs. Barry’s!!!

http://www.hillaryclintonquarterly.com/hillaryclintonsthesis.htm


119 posted on 04/29/2010 9:13:38 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: danamco

Good questions. I believe that after Rezko was arrested an investigation into many of his ties was begun — including Obama. I believe Fitzgerald may have “stumbled” onto the Pay-to-play scheme in the course of another investigation, personally. However, that is again just speculation. [Apart from Rezko, I’d bet Hillary was calling in favors from the moment she realized the DNC was backing Obama and denying her delegates.]

Good point about Rev. Manning’s “trial” as well... However, there is no way Manning’s “trial” could enter into SCOTUS.

In regards to Hillary and Obama’s ideology — completely understand that. However, I don’t think Hillary wants to destroy our country like Obama does. I truly do NOT think Obama is adhering to any Socialist ideology - unlike Hillary who probably TRULY believes in Collectivism.

Obama strikes me as much more of a fascist (narcissistic is an understatement - I think he believes he IS divinity himself... I gather this from so many statements he, and his supporters (incl. Farrakhan calling him the messiah). I totally question his intentions as well, because it seems he is doing EVERYTHING possible to destroy us, and make us weak in front of our enemies.

I don’t think Hillary is that stupid — she wants power no doubt, and to advance a socialist (communist) agenda, but as far as how she would interact with foreign leaders — I think she’d be more respectful, and would at least follow protocol. Obama is infantile, really. I think she would be a MUCH tougher negotiator than Obama (whom the world just laughs at now).

It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to defend Hillary, but if we’re talking of the lesser of two evils, I’d have to pick Hillary over Obama any day... At least she was born and grew up here so there is at least a chance she understands the American Dream. Also, she was a Goldwater girl, so perhaps somewhere inside her lies a love for our country, and a little more understanding than Obama as far as economics...

Wanted to say that yes, I’m aware of all the horrible things she and Bill have done in their quest for power. I don’t believe Obama is “clean” when it comes to “silencing” the opposition either (I’m reminded of the 3 openly gay men in Wright’s church who were murdered during the campaign - including the choir director in touch with Sinclair).

Anyway, as I said — if it were between Obama or Hillary? I’d have to go with Hillary... Hillary vs. a real conservative? DEFINITELY the Conservative and I’d fight tooth and nail against her in a regular campaign!


120 posted on 04/30/2010 12:29:27 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson