Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defendant in Palin hacking case won't testify
Associated Press ^ | April 26, 2010 | Associated Press

Posted on 04/26/2010 8:31:26 AM PDT by libstripper

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. -- The attorney for a former University of Tennessee student charged with hacking Sarah Palin's e-mail says the defendant will not testify in his federal trial in Knoxville.

(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidkernell; hacking; kernell; palin; palinemail; palinfreeperping; palinkernellhacker; rabscuttle; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: martin_fierro
Not putting the defendant on is a calculated risk. You have to weigh the damage his testimony may do against what the prosecution has already put into evidence. What many people do not understand is that if you begin to testify about a certain subject, you lose your right to refuse to testify later on that subject under the 5th Amendment when you are cross-examined. If you are reasonably sure that having your client testify will open up the door for the prosecution to ask questions you would rather not have your client answer, then you must consider not putting him on. The obvious problem is that, despite the fact that the court will advise the jury that no inference can be drawn in a criminal case if the defendant chooses not to testify, only an idiot would believe that the jury is going to take that admonition seriously.
21 posted on 04/26/2010 8:53:59 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DManA

He would have been threaded to pieces if he was faced with cross/examination!!!


22 posted on 04/26/2010 8:56:05 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarC
You were saying ...

Anybody who thinks for a moment the hacking of Palin’s email was just an “innocent” prank by a dumb kid, is even dumber than the hacker.

I don't know the "make-up" of the jury selection, but I would say that the smartest move that the defense could have done -- would be to have parents in the jury pool... because parents actually do know how "stupid their kids are" ... LOL ...

And I'm saying that as a staunch defender of Palin and I think the kid did engage in a crime... as I've said before on previous threads on this topic.

It's just that I also know how stupid kids are (and some parents have stupid 25-year old kids, too... doncha know...).

23 posted on 04/26/2010 8:56:14 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Constitution Day
In my experience:

Barrister Fierro...

24 posted on 04/26/2010 8:58:58 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: danamco

From the defense’s point of view, the smartest thing they could do!!!


25 posted on 04/26/2010 8:59:40 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: danamco

they could make money with a pay per view of that cross examination......too bad he’s such a coward he won’t take the stand.


26 posted on 04/26/2010 9:02:45 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: DManA

I have no problem with him getting a good defense, I just hope people, including the judge, are fed up with hackers, spammers, identify thieves and punks like this to start sending a strong message that jacking someone’s email is as serious as jacking their car or any other “theft of” crime.


28 posted on 04/26/2010 9:09:24 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DManA

No background on the perp yet? Curious lack of intereston APs part... /s


29 posted on 04/26/2010 9:12:40 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
From what I understand, in general, the only reason the defendant should testify is the defense team believes (s)he will be be convicted otherwise. It's a last-ditch attempt to gain credibility for the defense's case.

I'm sure that that's the attitude of the typical (US) defense lawyer.And it's understandable because,as Dershowitz *himself* once acknowledged,most criminal defendants are,in fact,guilty as charged.But if I'm on trial and I am,in fact,*not* guilty them I'm testifying.I wouldn't fear the prosecutor.I'd answer his/her questions plainly,calmly and respectfully...regardless of how piggish he/she is to me.By my answers...and my demeanor...I'd make even the most skilled prosecutor look,at best,foolish...if not down right evil.

What I've just said only applies if I'm innocent.Given that I'm a very poor liar and an even worse actor I'd never be a match for *any* prosecutor if I was guilty...so I wouldn't even try.If you're ever a juror at a trial where *I'm* the defendant you'll know I'm innocent if I testify...and guilty if I don't.

An example...from fiction.Shawshank Redemption...opening trial scene.The defendant,who is *not* guilty,as we learn later,is asked by the prosecutor..."hmmm...,you claim not to have done it but when asked to produce the gun you've spoken of to confirm your story it cannot be found.Now isn't *that* convenient?!" His response,delivered firmly yet calmly,"given that I'm not guilty I find it decidedly *inconvenient* that the gun cannot be found".

Yes,he was convicted...but he would have been convicted anyway.

30 posted on 04/26/2010 9:15:42 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.


31 posted on 04/26/2010 9:26:35 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day

Don’t make me your One Phone Call.

< |xP~


32 posted on 04/26/2010 9:30:15 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DManA

IMHO he would do himself a lot of good if he wiped the constant smirk off of his face. That usually doesn’t go over too well with juries. I’ve heard the areais heavily republican so his plead being a prank at his age probably won’t go over vbery well. He isn’t 14 afterall!


33 posted on 04/26/2010 10:31:02 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl
How can it be racism if they're both white

Everything conservatives do is racism to liberals. So why not the same for them?

34 posted on 04/26/2010 10:49:44 AM PDT by llevrok (TEA wakes up America !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Terry Franks posted screen shots of young Kernell’s Facebook page shortly after his mail fraud became public:

http://terryfrank.net/?p=3591

Kernell described himself as an Obamacrat and listed Obama and the disgraced John Edwards as Facebook Friends. He listed FB groups such as “UT Students for Obama” and “Anti-War, Pro Kittens” (which has an avatar of Georg W. Bush eating a kitten). The little Democrat dirty trickster is also a big Colbert fan. Go figure...

- JP


35 posted on 04/26/2010 10:51:47 AM PDT by Josh Painter ("Every time a Democrat mocks Sarah Palin, an independent gets its wings." - JP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DManA

He doesn’t want to testify because he would be forced to admit who told him to do this..it was definitely not him..he is not smart enough to come up with this idea on his own. Just look at him, probably has the IQ of 60..someone should hack into HIS account and follow the trail


36 posted on 04/26/2010 10:59:13 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Whatya want to know? David Kernell is a former UT student, a Memphian and the son of a Democrat politician.


37 posted on 04/26/2010 11:01:11 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("We must have pie. Stress cannot exist in the presence of pie." David Mamet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Palin put her finger on this during the interviews that followed her testimony. This young man's lawyers did him no service by bringing this to Court. They should have copped a plea, and he would have a chance to take a good knuckle bashing and move on... but now, he is in deep doo doo.

The Testimony has been so overwhelming that it would essentially take jury nullification to save him from his well deserved fate. And, I just don't think that is very likely.

38 posted on 04/26/2010 8:09:11 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Here are a series of FReeper articles on the E-mail Hacker, David Kernell and Sarah Palin ...




39 posted on 04/30/2010 7:21:12 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson