"It was "student note" written by a law student"
It was a scholarly work published in the Yale Law Journal. If you weren't an uneducated rube, you might have figured that one out on your own, smart-ass. Again, for the intellectually challenged, here's the article... Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility: Resolving Two Hundred Years of Uncertainty, 97 Yale L.J. 881 (1988).
----------------------------
For starters, have a look at the document name: "pryor_note.pdf" Follow that with doing a search in her NOTE, for the term NOTE. You'll see that SHE call's this brilliant piece of "scholarly work" a NOTE.
Not enough for you? Try this on for size then, you ignoramus you...
"Twenty years ago, I examined this question in my student note for the “Yale Law Journal,”"Written by none other than you vaunted "blue chipper" Jill A. Pryor herself on Tuesday, April 08, 2008 in an article titled McCain bid revives 'natural' question
It was a STUDENT NOTE!
Schneider v. Rusk found that native born had the "same rights of citizenship" as Natural Born. Right? Right. Guess what, Naturalized citizens HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS OF "citizenship" AS WELL! Your case there, ANTI-BIRTHER BOY, did NOT say that native citizens are eligible to be POTUS. Now, did they?
Your so blinded by the copious amounts of Barry Kool-Aid you've ingested, that you didn't even read your own quote from the case: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1. "
Who's the burger flipper here? Stunning!
STUDENT NOTE, from 1988. LMAO! Funny, but not.
You have no idea what a complete imbecile you are, which is profoundly entertaining. If you hadn't received your education from the government, you might know that ALL student articles found in the Yale Law Review are - by tradition - described as "notes". If you are PUBLISHED in a law review, you have PUBLISHED - by definition - a scholarly work.
But, since you've plainly never read a law review in your life, much less been published, your ignorance is excusable, your unfounded arrogance is not. Stick to TVGuide, it's clearly more your speed.
No they don't, moron. Naturalized citizens cannot be President.
It will be an election issue in November.And sooner or later the official pretend president of the United States is going to be cornered with it.
and rxsid is correct about the issue of defining a natuarl born citizen. It is quite clearly been defined by historical usage. WHether some creatibve liberal lefy=tist judge breathes new life into it in the furture remains to be seen. All the arguing that there is any other interpretation other than historical as evidenced by rxsid is a waste of breath.