None of that is required to prove citizenship. If Obama was required to produce anything (and this is highly unlikely), the COLB he's already shown would be sufficient.
It is sufficient to show he's NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
Yeh -- but which COLB???
The COLB that he decides to present might just be sufficient evidence of FRAUD on his part implicating Pelosi and the DNC and the state of Hawaii.
So have at it --
He hasn’t “shown” it. Someone put some image on the internet.
If it was genuine his COLB actually would be enough to tell us all we want to know. Because if it was genuine it would have note of an amendment made in 2006 to complete the birth certificate, since Obama was not in Hawaii to be examined within 30 days of birth by a Hawaii doctor who would complete the certificate for him.
I’m almost positive that Obama’s birth certificate was not complete until 2006.
But for any legal decision to be made - according to Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 - the original BC and all the supporting documents have to be viewed. So even though the COLB would tell us that the claim of a Hawaii birth is suspect, the original and other documents (the vital records - plural - that Fukino referred to) would have to be seen as well in order for a legal determination to be made.
More information at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
Why does Obama keep everything sealed?
Yes, but at least he would be “presenting” it to an official and not two college smoes at a website like he did with factcheck.org.
He hasn’t shown anything, not even a COLB.
Others have posted forgeries on the internet - Hawaii’s Department of Health and Hawaii’s AG have refused to certify those COLBs as authentic.