Is that the Roberts post about the re-administration of the Oath of Office?
I actually think that was just an honest mistake by Roberts, and all parties - including Roberts - thought it best to re-administer the oath to err on the side of caution.
Err on the side of caution?
I need to clean up my monitor.
When in this whole debacle has ANYBODY erred on the side of real caution? Erred in favor of making absolutely SURE that everything was how it should be?
The irony of your statement is beyond belief.
No, it was his “secret” meeting as the selected Usurper with SCOTUS members to “take” care of everything that we now clearly see is transpiring today in courts, and naturally before he scolded them publicly in the SOUA (address)!!!