Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2010 4:32:46 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; Altera; ...

Ping


2 posted on 04/21/2010 4:33:05 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Pelousy insisted that 400,000 new jobs would be created when o-care was passed.

Still waiting...


3 posted on 04/21/2010 4:34:07 PM PDT by Carley (I'll keep clinging to the constitution, my guns and my religion, thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Public hangings of the guilty come to mind.


4 posted on 04/21/2010 4:37:47 PM PDT by Gator113 (I do not want Obama just IMPEACHED... I want him IMPRISONED. Are we there yet? 2010-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Lying SOB’s are going to here from the U.S. citizens come November.


5 posted on 04/21/2010 4:43:36 PM PDT by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
But wait: If insurance companies are forced by the federal government to cover people with expensive pre-existing conditions, and the federal government won't allow them to raise premiums to keep up with new federal government-imposed costs, couldn't they go out of business? Gee, if I didn't know better, I'd suspect that was precisely the point of this wonderful program.

Only a fool would believe that you could force the insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions, remove the lifetime cap on benefits, and allow "children" up to the age of 26 to be covered under their parents' insurance without raising premiums. Preventing these increases based on actuarial data will kill the private insurance companies, which was the objective all along.

6 posted on 04/21/2010 4:44:21 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

but... but.... why would we need a law to prevent premiums from shooting up???? This was supposed to lower premiums...

/just damn sarc


8 posted on 04/21/2010 5:11:21 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Will Obamacare Shackle America’s Economic Future? (Part 1)—Moody’s Seems To Think So

"If one looks closely at the bill’s provisions, you can see that it is laden with new taxes, fees, and cutbacks in services."

The bill actually mandates higher costs and fewer services.

12 posted on 04/21/2010 6:35:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (Duncan Hunter, Jim DeMint, Michelle Bachman, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
federal regulation of rates,

Well, yeah b/c if the federal government mandates that something is so then *poof* magically it happens. I can't wait until they regulate moonbeams and rainbows, and imagine how good it will be when they write a mandate that gumdrops will fall from the sky!
13 posted on 04/21/2010 7:45:39 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson