Posted on 04/21/2010 11:27:28 AM PDT by pissant
Edited on 04/21/2010 11:29:49 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
White House aides are scoffing at a move in the Arizona legislature to force President Obama to show his birth certificate to get on the state's ballot in 2012 for his likely re-election battle.
(Excerpt) Read more at ac360.blogs.cnn.com ...
PING
>>White House aides are scoffing at a move in the Arizona legislature to force President Obama...<<
Well, THAT was unexpected. ;)
“scoffing” from the White House, masters of mockery
wil it work to stifle the questions? How dumb and timid are people, anyway?
We need Freerpers to write Senators and Representatives in their states and ask that similar type legislation be introduce and, hopefully, signed into state law before the 2012 election.
I read the Arizona proposed law and it did not mention BHO anywhere. It mentioned candidates running for POTUS on Arizona ballots. This is a law that applies to anyone running, not just BHO.
“This is a question that has been answered exhaustively,”
Sayin’ it don’t make it so. It is not a question that has been answered. It is a question that has been ridiculed.
“The lady doth protest too much.”
The SOB knows he is a fraud. I hope AZ gets this passed ASAP and other states follow.
Pass the Law, and they won’t be scoffing anymore.
.... see how they respond if Texas does the same
wouldn’t it be great if a whole lot of states decided to do this to prevent the interlopers from shucking and jiving their way into office with the media’s help?
Obama-commie is nothing but a thug.
Take you two minutes to end this Barry. Why doncha?
I think they’re exhausted from not answering the question.
I hope the law specifies that the birth certificate must be the long-form original reflecting the hospital and doctor’s signature. Hawaii apparently claims their “Certification of Live Birth” abstract, which is all that Obama’s shown and which does not include that info, is good for all legal purposes, and he might try to use that.
“The White House seems very testy over a state actually setting up a mechanism that will ask for proof of one of the Constitutional requirements for a president. Although Obama might be the first incumbent president that will be affected it affects all presidential candidate equally and is a fair law...despite their howls of protestation.”
Well said!
Funny how their only defense is to attack those who seek to have candidates be properly vetted as “birthers”.
Why in the world would they be upset? Just follow the law and you will appear on the ballot.So easy even an idiot can do it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.