Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Columbine and Va. Tech Families Take On Gun Show ‘Loophole’
New York Times ^ | April 19, 2010 | BERNIE BECKER

Posted on 04/19/2010 3:33:16 PM PDT by Second Amendment First

Family members of those killed or wounded in the shootings at Virginia Tech and Columbine High School signed advertisements running today that called on lawmakers to support closing the “gun show loophole.”

The advertisements appeared close to the anniversary of both shootings, and as gun rights rallies were set to occur in and around Washington.

In Virginia, a group called Virginians for Public Safety placed an advertisement in The Richmond Times-Dispatch asking that the state’s two Democratic senators, Jim Webb and Mark Warner, get behind closing the loophole. And the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence sponsored a newspaper ad in two Colorado cities urging Senator Mark Udall, a Democrat, to support ending the policy that allows the purchase of firearms at gun shows without the sort of background checks needed at federally registered gun shops.

Legislation that would subject buyers at gun shows to background checks has roughly 100 sponsors in the House and more than 15 in the Senate, including Colorado’s other senator, Michael Bennet, also a Democrat.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2010 3:33:16 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

....ignoramuses....all....


2 posted on 04/19/2010 3:35:06 PM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I thought all the VA Tech shooter's guns were transferred through FFLs and that he filled out 4473's and passed the NICS check. The "gunshow loophole" is completely irrelevant to that case.

As for Columbine, I thought at least the Tec-9 was bought for the shooters by older kids in a straw-purchase, which is already illegal.

I hate to criticize the victims' families, but since they're trying to steal my liberty, I'm gonna go ahead and call them morons.

3 posted on 04/19/2010 3:37:02 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

No such thing.
The rules at a gun show are the exact same for those in society and at gun shops.


4 posted on 04/19/2010 3:37:15 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

How long before they go after talk radio because of a First Amendment “loophole”?


5 posted on 04/19/2010 3:37:49 PM PDT by Spok (One man's freedom is another man's loophole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Second Amendment First

I really feel for the families of the victims. But their heads are screwed on all wrong — this is like suggesting “we tear the observatory down” to keep meteors fro hitting Earth (a la the Simpsons).

It is because there were NO guns on campus that their loved ones are dead. Just 1 CCW would have ended the rampage and many would be alive today.

These people are letting their grief trump their brains. Just like liberals let emotion trump reason.


7 posted on 04/19/2010 3:40:29 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Here’s an idea: teach your children to handle a weapon with confidence. And maybe they’ll even ignore stupid campus rules and carry discreetly.


8 posted on 04/19/2010 3:40:38 PM PDT by jagusafr (Don't make deals with pirates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The whole purpose of these idiots who shout “gun show loophole” is to end ALL private sales of firearms, not just at “gun shows.”

These liberals define a “gun show” as two people getting together, one to sell a firearm, one to purchase a firearm.
Even in the privacy of your own home.

That’s their agenda....NO private sales of any kind.


9 posted on 04/19/2010 3:42:12 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm voting for Sarah Palin because she pisses off the right people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greensnake

To whom, oh wise and all-knowing wizard?


10 posted on 04/19/2010 3:42:30 PM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greensnake
The 2nd amendment does not gurantee gun ownership. Gun ownership should be restricted.

greensnake

Since Apr 18, 2010


11 posted on 04/19/2010 3:42:34 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greensnake

>>The 2nd amendment does not gurantee gun ownership. Gun ownership should be restricted.<<

You forgot the /sarcasm tag...


12 posted on 04/19/2010 3:42:41 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

There is no such thing as a “gun show loophole”.


13 posted on 04/19/2010 3:42:55 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Greetings, and how are you today, comrade?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: greensnake


16 posted on 04/19/2010 3:44:56 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greensnake; Admin Moderator

looking at your previous posts, I must say that you are either:
a troll,
or you consistently forget your sarcasm tags.


17 posted on 04/19/2010 3:45:02 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Greetings, and how are you today, comrade?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I knew Tom Mauser would be in there somewhere. He’s made a very good living off his son’s death.


18 posted on 04/19/2010 3:45:05 PM PDT by real saxophonist (The fact that you play tuba doesn't make you any less lethal. -USMC bandsman in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greensnake

Where did this concept come from? Did you forget a /sarc tag or something?
There is no basis for “restricting gun ownership” unless you represent a tyrant who fears the governed. I do agree that the the world is a better place when the government fears the governed rather than the other way around. The Second Amendment wouldn’t have been necessary had governments been trustworthy.


19 posted on 04/19/2010 3:45:40 PM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Closing any “loopholes” in laws (or enacting laws of any type for that matter) is not going to solve the underlying cause of Columbine: two very dark, troubled, angry and faithless young men with contempt for their fellow living souls. You cannot solve that problem with legislation, only by changing the culture beginning in the home.

Liberals will never admit this because they are the primary cause for the devolution of our national culture.


20 posted on 04/19/2010 3:45:55 PM PDT by LostInBayport (2010 - The Second American Revolution. The first shot was fired 1/19/2010 -- here in Massachusetts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson