While I think Hillyer went out of his way to be a little petty, I do share his and others concerns about Palin’s lack of experience. If it’s a choice between her and Obama, well naturally there is no choice. But I would like to see more of what she could do in a capacity such as a senator. Remember, she not only has to convince many Pubbies, she has to convince many indys.
One thing that “experience” won’t rub off is the
“stink” of Christianity (2 Corinthian 2:14-16).
The “scent of Christ” is as much the stench of death to the perishing as it is the sweet perfume of life to the saved.
This explains a lot of the vehement hatred we’re seeing.
The senate is no place for executive leaders. Would have also been nice for Reagan to have come to the presidency with a little less experience (age)—but times choose our leaders rather than the other way around. And, as has been asked here, who better for 2012?
and if it's a choice between:
1. Palin
2.Romney
3.Jindel
4.Paul
5.Huckabee
6.McCain
You pick who???????
“But I would like to see more of what she could do in a capacity such as a senator.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Being a senator is possibly the WORST background for president! Traditionally it has been nearly impossible to go from sitting senator to president. Of course this last time both major candidates were sitting senators so the rule didn’t apply. I don’t know offhand of a single person who went from the senate to the presidency and became a great president.