"You falsely claimed that they didn't read the article, when in fact, you had no basis for your claim."AT least attempt to be accurate in you knee-jerk, emotional responses. I was very clear in saying that "probably" haven't read it. That is not an assertion of fact, it is an assumption based on my reading of some of the comments based on what they said about the article.
"There is no rule or requirement that we must dissect an "opinion column" line by line, to voice our "opinions" of said columns."Nice strawman. No one made such a claim.
"BTW, some of Hillyer's so-called facts, were wrong . . ."Which of course means that some of the facts are accurate . . . and you have failed to provide any evidence that your claim about the budget numbers is the truth.
Have a nice evening, Sudetenland.