To: Sudetenland
I think your
post # 361 reveals the reason you determined Hillyer's column was factual and fair...lol.
Have a nice evening, Sudetenland.
367 posted on
04/19/2010 2:53:19 PM PDT by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: onyx
I see, like many of the Palinbots here, you are making the claim that anyone who is critical of Sarah is an Obama supporter. That's okay, I understand how hard it is to justify your support for a half-term governor as a Presidential candidate. You are forced to make the same kind of extremist claims that the Obama libtards make . . . "Look he's a racist because he opposes Obama."
Your claim, "Look he's an Obama supporter because he questions Sarah's qualifications.
Here's a clue, she's no Maggie Thatcher, she's no Ronald Reagan, she's no Dick Cheney, she's not even a Jean Kirkpatrick. Give her another 15 years of maturing and possibly she will be prepared for the presidency. Right now she's just a right-wing version of Obama . . . lots of personal appeal, no real substance.
Although, I do think she's got loads of potential and in a heads up match with Obama, I'd take her any day of the week. Problem is, that is damning her with faint praise.
370 posted on
04/19/2010 3:02:08 PM PDT by
Sudetenland
(Slow to anger but terrible in vengence...such is the character of the American people.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson