Posted on 04/19/2010 5:06:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
Is he promoting Hillary for the Supreme Court? (God help us.)
Interesting take. Thanks for posting.
Don’t be fooled.
Both Clintons are as much communist as Obammie the Commie.
Fine, let her run. Not that it will fix the damage Hussein has done. Despite being shunned by the party in ‘08, she still went along with the game and aided in him being elected. That isn’t going to set well with many voters. No, the GOP played hot potato with this admin. and got their way making them just as guilty or more so. Still, the ball was in the rat’s court and even old wrinkled bulbous nosed and past his prime Bubba himself won’t be able to pull this one out of the fire.
Both of your posts are right on IMO.
I don’t think so, I think they are preparing to kneecap Obama - and I’m sure she’s gathered a great deal of damaging information on him since they became BFF. Hmmmm, that’s a cat fight I’m going to enjoy. I know Hillary remembers when Michelle made this comment:
Michelle Obama takes a shot at Hillary Clinton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN1qZMBE9Gc&feature=PlayList&p=6DD71E5CECC0E2AD&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=6
(That’s pretty funny since most of the country is aware that Michelle is a beard LOL)
or
Barack Obama: Hillary talking like she’s Annie Oakley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzQxFtM9cfk&feature=related
The Clintoon’s are best described as ‘Nazi’s’ - National Socialists’
‘Nazi’ is sometimes used by the extreme left to describe ‘Right Wingers’. That is because it is less left than Communism, but it is still far left.
Note that the Alinski’s are masters of recreating definitions to suit their leftist, Communist, Nazi, socialist cause.
Machiavelli has nothing on Slick Willy.
I bet that he is. He made a comment over the weekend that he "didn't think it's necessary for a SCOTUS pick to be a judge." Translated: "I can deliver a lot of votes for you in 2010 and 2012, 0bama. Pick Hillary."
I expect that Hillary will challenge Obama in the 2012 primaries, both because of her ambitions and pressure from Democrat insiders after a Republican sweep of the 2010 elections and Obama’s continued drop in the polls.
Then again, the Supreme Court might be the last place he wants Hillary should he be brought up on treason charges etc. lol
If hClinton tries to challenge sitting-President Obama, she will be viewed badly by her own party.
The only way she can come out ahead is if the party dumps Obama (that is, he feigns illness and declines a 2nd term, for example). IIRC, only one sitting Prez has ever lost a primary to a member of his own party who went on to win the WH.
Otherwise, those so disenchanted with him will not vote for another Dem. They will vote for the opposition. That is, unless the Grand OLD Party pulls defeat out of the jaws of victory and nominations another Dole or McCain type candidate [which they can, and probably will, do].
Team Obama took down Team Clinton once. They likely can do it again. Even embattled, Obama can win a 2nd term if he manages to make the economy appear to be improving some. bClinton won a 2nd term, when many of us figured he couldn’t. Obama will likely do the same, with a few strategic moves in the next 2 years.
Incumbency is difficult to beat — in the primaries and in the general.
You will know when this is a reality when the seeded Clintonistas of the press begin publically scrutinizing bammy. Until then you know the Clintons have not decided it in their best interest. I would imagine that Hillary may need to step down before September to spend time with her ailing husband. That way she is removed from the Nov 2010 electoral disaster and can comment and rally the troops.
“I dont think so, I think they are preparing to kneecap Obama.”
Yeah four lying, cheating ,socialist libs going at each other, how low could they go?? Get lots of popcorn! lol
“Machiavelli has nothing on Slick Willy.”
It makes you wonder about reincarnation.
Democrats are pushing for a gay into the Supreme Court it’s all about special treatment for votes.
I agree, but see that as being her approach to obtaining power.
NAZI-ism/Fascism is one of the incremental steps to absolute power over business and civil liberties, which I believe to be her ultimate goal.
The problem that every statist finds is that once they decide the government should be the dominate power in a society, there is no half-way point. What they find is that they must increase the scope of their power and the intensity of their power (at the expense of civil liberties) in order to try to control that which inevitably falls apart.
I see all these left-leaning -isms as nothing more than incremental steps toward absolute Statism, even if their adherents believe each to be an end in itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.