Cahill had the courage to show up at the Boston TeaParty...Baker did not!!!
NO MORE splitting votes and giving the seat to the RATS. I will NEVER AGAIN fall for that scumbag, alinskyite, boondoggle ruse. I am voting Republican, NOT independent, straight down the line.
So, should we assume that the “Establishment Republicans” have held on to the party nominating process, and attempted to “put the Tea Party activists in their place?” It would certainly make sense to me. And if that is going to happen anywhere, it’s certainly going to happen in New England — especially in Taxachussetts.
It seems to me that if Charlie Baker hasn’t the conviction or the courage to attend the Tea Party and take a stand, he isn’t worth supporting or voting for. On the other hand, Mr. Cahill had better have something better to offer than rage and attendance at the Tea Parties to back his candidacy — or he could very well be a bigger disaster than Baker.
True, but Carly’s wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing ad could have been written for Cahill.
The sad part is that Cahill is much more conservative than Baker. Here in Massghanistan we have the Far Left, the Farther Left, and the Ultra Left.
The reason Massachusetts doesn’t have a hockey team is because the politicians cannot find a center or a right wing, are soft on defense, and tried to use an ICE agent as a goalie and he let everything by him.
Point Cahill.